Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Footballfan190 3

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

[edit] Footballfan190

Final (0/3/0); ended 07:35, 19 March 2008 (UTC) - closed by non-crat user:anonymous dissident per SNOW. -- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 07:35, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Footballfan190 (talk · contribs) - YOUR DESCRIPTION OF THE USER Footballfan190 (talk) 06:34, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

[edit] Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?

A: I want to take part in projects that deal with animals.

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

A: My best contributions are fighting vandalism because I check for recent changes and give the proper warnings.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: I have been in some conflicts with anonymous users. Because they kept sending attacks, I asked some administrators for help.

[edit] General comments

• See Footballfan190's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.

• Links for Footballfan190: Footballfan190 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · search an, ani, cn, an3)

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Footballfan190 before commenting.

[edit] Discussion

[edit] Support

[edit] Oppose

1. Oppose - Sorry, but I feel that this RfA is a tad premature - with just over a 1000 or so edits, it's likely that you have a few more things to learn about wikipolicy. This coupled with almost nonexistant article building and localized project space work leads me to believe that you require further exploration. Also, the answers to the questions are pretty perfunctory and generic. Doesn't really do yourself justice. I suggest WP:ADMINCOACH and another few months work in admin-areas such as WP:CSD, WP:ANI, WP:AVI, and WP:XfD. Cheers, and happy editing to you. Wisdom89 _{(T / ^C)} 06:49, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
2. Oppose as well. I removed this self nomination once, and it was brought back. To soon, not even finished before added here and really doesnt stand a chance. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 06:56, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
3. Oppose Not ready. Still. Jmlk17 07:03, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Neutral

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.