Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Footballfan190 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Contents

[edit] Footballfan190

Final (1/9/0); closed 10:30, 3 January 2008 (UTC) by Daniel; scheduled to end 07:00, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:


[edit] Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
A: Fighting vandalizm on pages about animals and other things of my interests.
2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
A: My contributions to animals because I am always able to find soures and I try to be as accurate as possible. These are the cases when I do best at being accurate.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: No, and if it happens, I will give 2 warnings then a block.

[edit] General comments

RfAs for this user:
Requests for adminship/Footballfan190 Requests for adminship/Footballfan190 2 Requests for adminship/Footballfan190 3

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Footballfan190 before commenting.

[edit] Discussion

[edit] Support
  1. Moral Support - give it another year, or two. --'n1yaNt 09:03, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Oppose
  1. Sorry, but the answer to question 3 is disturbing. You cannot give blocks to people who you are in a dispute with. — DarkFalls talk 07:26, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  2. No. Last one closed on the 29th. You are not experienced enough by a long-shot. I suggest you withdraw. Keep at it, and come back in a few months and, we'll see. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 07:27, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  3. How's about we close this one and refrain from feeding this particular troll for a bit? He's a member of the Colbert Elephant Tripling Nation and has completely disregarded the closer's advice from his last attempt. I may not have given him his due - he could be a good faith contributor. But if you are, Footballfan, you need to heed the advice User:Keegan left you here. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 07:38, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  4. –Pomte 07:50, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  5. Whilst I admire your enthusiasm, less than a week between RfA's is not going to endear you to the community. Please, this will not pass and I urge you to consider other avenues such as editor review and adoption if you wish to obtain feedback or receive advice on how to help Wikipedia further. Best. Pedro :  Chat  08:01, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  6. Your enthusiasm is admirable, but you're short on experience. Please take about six months, explore the links Pedro gave you, and enjoy your stay at Hotel Wikipedia. As an aside, this is not original... Or helpful. Grandmasterka 08:52, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  7. I think in many months you may be able to re-apply and gain successful administrator status. Admins generally have a large amount of experience and edits, and both of these you are lacking.--Ali K (talk) 09:59, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  8. WP:SNOW Brianga (talk) 10:07, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  9. Per DarkFalls. Rt. 10:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Neutral
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.