Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Dynamic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that was closed as invalid and so did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

[edit] Dynamic

removed at (0/12/0) ended at 23:05, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Dynamic (talk · contribs) – YOUR DESCRIPTION OF THE USER Dynamic 18:08, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:I accept (Dynamic 18:12, 29 January 2006 (UTC))

Support

• Support. Obviously (NewMule 18:23, 29 January 2006 (UTC))

The above account is too new, and is a sockpuppet, so the vote is invalid. -lethe ^talk 00:20, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

#Support. Obviously. freestylefrappe 18:17, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

The above comment is made by the User:NewMule. Please do not fake other administrator's signatures, as it will get you blocked from editing. Thanks. --Ichiro (会話|+|投稿記録|メール) 18:30, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Per their user notice: This user is a sock puppet of Dynamic and has been blocked indefinitely. xaosflux ^Talk/_CVU 23:12, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Oppose

1. Oppose. Obviously. freestylefrappe 18:17, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
2. Oppose. Way too new. Also, see Dynamic's user page --NaconKantari e|t||c|m 18:19, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
3. Oppose Obvious reasons --lightdarkness 18:19, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
4. Oppose and plese withdraw less than 50 edits, incorrectly completed RFA... --pgk^(talk) 18:20, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
5. oppose dueto lack of editsBenon 18:20, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
6. Oppose. User's first contribution is today. Please consider withdrawing nomination to avoid a pileon here - you aren't going to get much in the way of constructive criticism yet as we don't really know you... (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:21, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
7. Oppose; very poor answers to questions. No edit summaries. smurrayinchester^{(User), (Talk)} 18:29, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
8. Oppose Lack of any edit summaries, time on Wikipedia, poor answers to questions to name the many things. Stick around and apply in the future. — Moe ε 22:31, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
9. Oppose if you can't even complete the self nom correctly. -lethe ^talk 23:08, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
10. STRONG Oppose. Per all above, please withdraw. xaosflux ^Talk/_CVU 23:10, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
11. Oppose he is new user (less than 24 hours)--Ugur Basak 23:32, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
12. Oppose--By far too new. Please consider withdrawal, get more experience and come back in 3 months.--Dakota ~ ε 00:28, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

    Please stop urging this user to withdraw until his block ends and he can withdraw (see comments). WP:BITE applies here. Chick Bowen 00:47, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Neutral

Comments

• Edit summary usage: 0% for major edits and 0% for minor edits. Based on the last 23 major and 1 minor edits outside the Wikipedia, User, Image, and all Talk namespaces. Mathbot 18:15, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
• See Dynamic's edit count and contribution tree with Interiot's tool.
• User has apparently used sockpuppets to vote in his RFA (NewMule). smurrayinchester^{(User), (Talk)} 21:14, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
• Note: Dynamic has now been blocked by Freestylefrappe(see log). There's not much point in continuing to urge him to withdraw until his block is up and he is able to do so. Chick Bowen 23:31, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.

A. I block vandals

2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

A. I am pleased with all of them.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A. No, I will leave them alone.

The following are some optional questions. There are no correct answers to these questions and I simply want to know your opinions rather than see a correct answer. Thanks! --Deathphoenix 23:11, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

4. When would you use {{test3}}/{{test4}}, and when would you use {{bv}}?

A.

5. What would you do if a user reverts an article four times in slightly more than 24 hours? (Thus obeying the letter of WP:3RR.)

A.

6. In your opinion, when should you speedy delete an article under CSD A7 (unremarkable people or groups) and when should you nominate it for an AFD instead?

A.

7. How would you apply NPOV to a controversial article that you are editing?

A.

8. What are your greatest frustrations with Wikipedia?

A.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.