Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Cyclonenim

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that was withdrawn by the candidate. Please do not modify it.

[edit] Cyclonenim

Final (5/5/1); Ended 20:30, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Cyclonenim (talk · contribs) - I'm a comparatively new user as I've been registered since 2006, however, I only became truly 'active' in December 2007. Most of my work here at Wikipedia has been towards the WikiProject Medicine, although I’ve contributed to several other WikiProjects and unrelated articles. Other than article creation/editing/reviewing, my work consists of reverting vandalism using several tools, mostly Vandal Fighter and Twinkle (and as such has allowed me to gain experience of using rollbacks). With slightly over 1000+ contributions to Wikipedia, I’m well aware of the chance of this self-nomination failing like many others; however, the chance of it succeeding and me being able to further help Wikipedia makes it seem all that much more worthwhile. Whichever way the RfA goes, I hope this will turn out to be a rewarding experience, both for me and other prospective candidates. CycloneNimrod^talk? 18:33, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Application has now been withdrawn, as per the comments below. Thanks a lot to all who participated in what must be one of the shortest RfA's in a while. I hope to hear from you all again in the future (both in other applications in my future ones). Thanks again, if anyone needs anything, you know where to find me ;) CycloneNimrod^talk? 20:17, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?

A: First and foremost, I wish to continue contributing to articles, both for WikiProject Medicine, amongst other articles. Secondly, I wish to continue my work in anti-vandalism and help secure and stabilise articles from such events as edit wars and other such disputes. Given the time and opportunity I'd also enjoy getting involved in the images side of Wikipedia, to help me gain more 'all-round' experience. Another area of interest would be developing/contributing to guidelines and policies.

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

A: My best contributions are most likely those which i've spent the most time on, of which include Mucormycosis and Sézary's disease. I've also enjoyed participating in the WikiProject Medicine Collaboration of the Week on a regular basis. Many of my contributions are still ongoing, I like to get things just right before leaving them entirely.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: I think anyone here on Wikipedia would say they've experienced less pleasant users than others during their time, and i'm not exception. I've dealt with stress towards other users by simply checking over what i'm saying before I save the page as this enables me to remove anything that I may deem overly harsh. I avoid getting into disputes and edit wars by ensuring after the second reversion of an article/talk page, the dispute is solved at an individual users talk page, not on the article/talk page in question. This allows for things to be dealt with in an overall more professional manner. Secondly, I'm aided by fellow editors with their opinions on the matter.

[edit] General comments

• See Cyclonenim's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.

• Links for Cyclonenim: Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · deleted · count · logs · block log · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · search an, ani, cn, an3)

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Cyclonenim before commenting.

[edit] Discussion

[edit] Support

1. Moral Support - Good editor and accomplished vandal-fighter, and I would encourage him to submit a second RfA in a couple of months' time (which I will definitely support). His civil responses to the opposers below also show that he has the right kind of character to make a good admin. However, he doesn't have enough experience yet in admin areas (as noted by opposers below), and q1 doesn't show a clear understanding of admin tasks. I am pleased to see that he has applied for admin coaching. Walton^One 20:06, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

   Thanks a lot for your kind words and support. I've chosen to remove my application as of now as per the comments below, it seems to make more sense for me to gain as much experience as possible before reapplying. In the long run, this should help me become a better administrator. Regards, and thanks again. CycloneNimrod^talk? 20:16, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

2. Support Sure. Read the new-admin handbook and I probably wouldn't block/delete/protect anything until you feel confident in your knowledge (but you don't seem like the type that would do that, anyway). Maybe take some time to watch what other, more experienced, admins are doing. Also, you're doing an excellent job being civil, polite, and demonstrating a commitment to the project. Keep up the excellent work, keep contributing, and continue the positive attitude! I'm sure you'll be a fine administrator.Lazulilasher (talk) 20:09, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

   Thank you, it means a lot to have your support! Regretfully, i'm withdrawing my application for now in order to gain more experience and understand the administrator role more thoroughly. Thanks again, I hope to hear from you again. CycloneNimrod^talk? 20:16, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

3. Strong moral support per Walton. It's a bit too early, but you're definitely on the right way. Dorftrottel (talk) 20:13, April 17, 2008

   Thank you for your kind words. CycloneNimrod^talk? 20:16, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

4. "...however, the chance of it succeeding and me being able to further help Wikipedia makes it seem all that much more worthwhile...". Bravo. What an excellent sentiment. I'm afraid this RFA will not pass, and I am of the opinion that you do need more experience, but I can't but not put in a Moral Support for such an excellent statement. Best wishes and Happy Editing. Pedro :  Chat  20:19, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
5. Support due to no negative interactions I can think of with this editor. Best, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 20:26, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Oppose

1. Oppose - I hate to be the first, but pursuing your contributions, there really is a paucity of admin-related areas you've actively participated in. You're a good editor though, and hey, we have similar topical interests. However, I think just a few more months of WP:CSD, WP:HD, WP:AIV, WP:ANI, WP:RFPP participation etc..etc.. would benefit you. Try WP:ADMINCOACH too. Cheers matey. Wisdom89 _{(T / ^C)} 18:50, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

   comment - Also, one other thing - you may want to set your preference so that the Wiki interface asks you to include an edit summary. This is usually a minor thing, but, coupled with the lack of experience, it's a little more valuable/essential. Edit summaries are good for communication and they allow thing to run a little more smoothly. Wisdom89 _{(T / ^C)} 18:52, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

   Thanks for your speedy reply and advice, I certainly understand your reasons for opposing my RfA and I hope that, given a few months, you will find me ready for progression. I'll be applying for Admin Coaching soon, too! Regards, CycloneNimrod^talk? 18:55, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

   You are certainly welcome. It's a good sign that you remain positive in the face of some opposition, that's an absolute credit to you. Might I suggest that you also, down the road, get a couple of editor reviews. It's a nice way to get some community feedback on your work. A excellent way for user's to judge your policy knowledge is offering advice at the help desk and new contributors help desk. Wisdom89 _{(T / ^C)} 19:11, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

2. Oppose Sorry, but you don't have enough editing experience yet. ArcAngel (talk) 18:51, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

   Thanks for your participating in my RfA. It's a shame to hear, but I understand. Thanks again, CycloneNimrod^talk? 18:58, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

3. Oppose About four month full-scale participating; too early, sorry. --Yooden ☮ 19:36, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

   Thanks for your participation :) CycloneNimrod^talk? 19:44, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

4. Oppose Obviously on the right track. User has taken an interest (albeit small) in contributing to things like AIV, 3RR, etc. Just needs more overall experience. Tool2Die4 (talk) 19:46, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

   I'm glad you think that way. Thanks for your interest. CycloneNimrod^talk? 19:57, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

   Oppose - If you are now seeking admin coaching, i suggest withdrawing from this RfA. Hope to see you back here in a few months :-) TheProf - T / C 20:08, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

   Done. Thanks for your comment and advice! :) CycloneNimrod^talk? 20:18, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

   Actually, you may wish to continue. Your support is now only 1 shy of your opposes. TheProf - T / C 20:27, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Neutral

1. Neutral Would probably make an ok admin if promoted now, but another couple of months experience would be best. Epbr123 (talk) 20:14, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

   I concur. Thanks for participating. CycloneNimrod^talk? 20:16, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.