Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Cacycle

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] cacycle

final (16/0/0) ending 11:40, 15 March 2005 (UTC)

I am around since early 2004 and as a registered user since July, 2004. My current edit counts are 1914 (all namespaces), 290 (last 30 days), 1142 (main namespace). For my interests and contributions see User:cacycle. I am currently most interested in the better admin reverting tools — "This should be no big deal," as Jimbo Wales has said... Cacycle 11:39, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Support

  1. I am honored to inscribe mine as the first supportive vote. --Ryan! | Talk 15:26, Mar 8, 2005 (UTC)
  2. Very active contributor on chemistry-related topics. Warofdreams 17:20, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  3. Support. Good luck :) Jordi·✆ 22:17, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  4. A rarity - a self-nom worth supporting! Grutness|hello? 23:49, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  5. We always need more people on cleanup. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 00:24, Mar 9, 2005 (UTC)
  6. Sure. --Slowking Man 06:57, Mar 9, 2005 (UTC)
  7. Good editor. Dbiv 15:31, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  8. --Rje 15:45, Mar 9, 2005 (UTC)
  9. Good editor JFW | T@lk 23:10, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  10. Excellent editor! Neutralitytalk 04:06, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)
  11. jni 18:54, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  12. Looks like some great contributions. - Mustafaa 01:59, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  13. His talk page shows he works well with others. Jonathunder 02:03, 2005 Mar 12 (UTC)
  14. Emphatically support. David Cannon 10:41, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  15. Support. Wile E. Heresiarch 15:41, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  16. Well suited to be an admin. Carbonite | Talk 16:02, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  17. Heck yes. --TenOfAllTrades | Talk 04:14, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Oppose

Neutral

Comments

Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
A. I will certainly continue to deal with vandalism as well as with cleaning-up, categorization, and other maintenance tasks. I don't know yet how much I will engage in specific admin work. I'm open to it and we'll see.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A. I am constantly working towards a good coverage of simple chemical topics. This includes the generation of chemical structure images and the addition of organic infoboxes with basic data. Examples are: Simple_aromatic_ring and many related articles including the creation of complex structure images, Solvent and many related articles, and Ether and several related articles. Recently I have also written on fundamental chemical concepts like Yield (chemistry) and Order_(chemistry). I am also constantly monitoring most drug related articles including the popular LSD and Ecstasy articles.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and will deal with it in the future?
A. Not really. I don't have problems to admit mistakes and I usually prefer to stay calm and to stick to the facts.