Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Brookie

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Brookie

Final (33/0/0) ended 03:55 [September 25, 2005] (UTC)

Brookie (talk · contribs) – Brookie looks like a good editor. He/she is frequently spotting Candidates for Speedy Deletion, which I then delete. Kate's tool says Brookie has 5410 edits, of which reasonably many in User and Wikipedia namespaces. — JIP | Talk 13:28, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Thank you for the nomination - if voted for I would be pleased to accept! The curate's egg 13:33, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support as nominator. — JIP | Talk 13:29, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
  2. Support I've come across Brookie before and was favourably impressed.--Cyberjunkie | Talk 13:32, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
  3. Martin 13:43, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
  4. Support - met my standards are! --Celestianpower hab 15:18, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
  5. Support. I'll be honest, I've never heard of Brookie before, but between his contribs, his answers to the questions, and the other people who are supporting him, I have no problem supporting. -GregAsche (talk) 15:28, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
  6. Support. Brookie is a good user deserving of adminship. Thryduulf 16:53, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
  7. Support.  Grue  17:33, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
  8. Support - good editor. Guettarda 18:10, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

  9. Journalist C./ Holla @ me!

  10. Support Antonio Jalapeno Martin 18:20, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
  11. Strong Support Will make a great Administrator and I'm proud to say that he is one of my best friends here in Wikipedia. Tony the Marine 18:24, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
  12. Support. I've seen Brookie around; he/she is a good editor. Jaxl | talk 18:36, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
  13. Support. I liked the answers and the overall behavior of the candidate. --Sn0wflake 20:34, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
  14. Support - useful eidts in relation to Snowtown South Australia and events associated with that town--AYArktos 21:57, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
  15. Support. Friday (talk) 22:30, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
  16. Fer sure. El_C 03:33, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
  17. Support. Slowly but surely the Dmcdevit cabal is becoming the cabal! :-) Dmcdevit·t 04:42, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
  18. Support. As far as I can tell, good-humored and a good editor who could use his own mop. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 08:30, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
  19. Support this experienced and nice editor. :-) --Idont Havaname 20:18, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
  20. Support Stewart Adcock 21:50, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
  21. Support another low profile, get on with Wikipedian. Alf melmac 22:04, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
  22. Support looks good. Ryan Norton T | @ | C 22:54, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
  23. Support Brookie is reliable and consistent in my experience and I think he'll make careful and fair decisions as an admin. Lisa 02:22, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
  24. Support. I don't personally know Brookie, but seems like an ideal candidate. Ral315 02:57, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
  25. Support. No plausible reason not to. -- BD2412 talk 15:46, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
  26. Support, and I still don't get the sig. But who cares, you should be an admin! Bratschetalk | Esperanza 21:04, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
  27. Support Very good contributor Zzyzx11 (Talk) 05:28, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
  28. Support Tintin 23:00, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
  29. Support ≈ jossi ≈ 23:19, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
  30. Support--Jusjih 08:26, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
  31. Support and sorry for the b'day mess. ;) User:Nichalp/sg 10:44, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
  32. Cool. JuntungWu 17:02, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
  33. Support. Type O Spud 19:54, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

Oppose

Neutral

Comments

Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
I think that dealing with those silly speedy delete-type articles and dealing with vandals will be my area of interest - those irritations that take up a lot of one's time and space on the Wiki!
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
I have started or contributed to quite a few articles since I joined the Wiki See here I am probably most pleased with my featured article AEJ Collins. I am also pleased with the articles on the various Studd family members - as they seem so interesting and the Marshman family (as they are relatives going back two hundred or so years).I have also had a featured picture which I am proud of.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
I have had a few minor spats in the past - but nothing too serious. One of the things that I have learned from the Wiki is that these don't really matter and one just needs to take a deep breath and move on - a useful lesson for the real world! When one remembers that one doesn't own the articles you work on and that contributions from others should help improve things - then it is easier to be relaxed about others' edits etc.