Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Bpazolli

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

[edit] Bpazolli

FInal (1/8/0) ended 09:34, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Bpazolli (talk · contribs) – A man whose articles have been called "A Stroke of Genius". A man who has created factual edits and articles despite resistance. A man who pledges his allegiance to the British crown. All in all an administrator for the people Bpazolli 03:14, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:I accept
Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
A:All of them to some degree. I can translate into 100 different languages for one and am a legendary computer programmer. I am also have 100% knowledge of what topics I know about and what I don't, thus I would not delete content blindly.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A:There too many to list. I am pleased with all of them.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A:Many users have caused me stress over there lack of knowledge on topics, thus they think there Hoaxs. However I have always delt with these users like children, and have only asked for an apology, despite there attempts to destroy my good name.
Comments
Support
1. I have watched this user from the very beginning and I have to say I haven’t seen such a professional user than this one. As well his allegiance to the Queen and his ability to translate are reasons enough for him to be administrator.--SwannCom 03:35, 12 August 2006 (UTC) (only edits of this user are to this page)
Oppose
  1. Oppose. Waaaay too new, the edits seen on his contributions page fall foul of several content policies, has received warnings for posting articles without sources, and has little, if no contributions, to Wikipedia namespace discussions. What has the Queen have to do with Wikipedia? Titoxd(?!?) 09:00, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  2. Oppose - Too new. Less that 50 eits. Don't like his comment about allegiance towards the Queen. I am also concerened that SwannCom above may be his sock. - Aksi_great (talk - review me) 09:04, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  3. Oppose per Titoxd. -- ADNghiem501 09:06, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  4. Oppose per above. Not experienced enough yet. DarthVader 09:16, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  5. Oppose Fails to meet my criteria --Masssiveego 09:17, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  6. Strong Oppose - per answers to the questions; they are obviously false (no one has the mental capacity to learn 100 languages), and an admin should not be dishonest. Too new and inexperienced. Also, inspection of the main RfA page's history reveals that the user repeatedly re-listed their RfA after it having been de-listed or reverted multiple times. Kalani [talk] 09:19, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  7. Oppose This looks facæcious and possibly a troll rather than a genuine application.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)    09:31, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  8. Oppose good luck in the future, buddy, but based on your current number of edits and your blatant exagerations in answers to the above questions, i highly recomend that you withdraw your nomination . . . --heah 09:33, 12 August 2006 (UTC)


Neutral
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.