Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Angr

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Angr

Vote here (30/0/0) ending 14:40 10 September 2005 (14:40 UTC) Angr (talk · contribs) - a professional linguist editing mainly (but not only) linguistics related articles, I am always glad to see Angr's name show up on my watchlist. He has proven himself valuable in both adding original content, and defending existing content against degradation. kate says Angr has 7372 edits (two thirds of which are to article namespace). dab (ᛏ) 14:40, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

I am pleased and honored to accept dab's nomination for adminship.

Support

  1. dab (ᛏ) 14:41, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
  2. Support, SqueakBox 15:49, September 3, 2005 (UTC)
  3. FireFox  T C 15:54, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
  4. Thought he was one. --Merovingian (t) (c) 16:00, September 3, 2005 (UTC)
  5. Support. Angr is one of a few editors whose contributions I occasionally go and have a look at just to see what interesting stuff he has been working on. Great contributor who also gets involved outside the article space in VfD AfD etc. Will make a fine admin. — Trilobite 16:09, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
  6. Support, an ever-interesting contributor. Rje 16:13, September 3, 2005 (UTC)
  7. Support, seems reasonable enough. — JIP | Talk 16:40, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
  8. Martin - The non-blue non-moose 18:08, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
  9. Support-Although I think there are no important things then edit counts, 7000+ shows and outstanding devotion. Ive also seen some of his work and think he will make an excellent admin. --Gpyoung talk 18:14, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
  10. Strong support. Thought he was one. Dmcdevit·t 20:16, September 3, 2005 (UTC)
  11. Support. Dependably good quality work from this user. Fire Star 21:57, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

  12. Journalist C./ Holla @ me!

  13. Support why not Ryan Norton T | @ | C 02:36, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
  14. But of course Radiant_>|< 07:58, September 4, 2005 (UTC)
  15. Support Paul August ☎ 14:44, September 4, 2005 (UTC)
  16. BRIAN0918 • 2005-09-4 17:36
  17. Support; excellent candidate. Antandrus (talk) 17:41, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
  18. Support. I really thought he was one! Redwolf24 (talk) 21:23, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
  19. Andre (talk) 21:32, September 4, 2005 (UTC)
  20. Support Very active on VFD AFD and linguistics related articles. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 03:46, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
  21. Support Lectonar 08:08, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
  22. Support. Meets my guidelines. android79 19:37, September 5, 2005 (UTC)
  23. Support. —Felix the Cassowary (ɑe hɪː jɐ) 11:04, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
  24. Support Proto t c 11:22, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
  25. Support. El_C 23:54, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
  26. səˈpɔːt. Flowerparty 06:19, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
  27. Support. – Bratschetalk | Esperanza 21:00, September 7, 2005 (UTC)
  28. Support — interesting contributions ~ Veledan • Talk + new 21:28, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
  29. Support. Got skills. -- BD2412 talk 01:23, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
  30. Support. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 01:46, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
  31. Support-- Pjacobi 07:30, September 8, 2005 (UTC)
  32. Support Answered some wp:rd questions of mine. Thats all i know of Angr. --Wonderfool t(c) 10:38, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
  33. Support Is prepared to go the extra mile when its necessary. Alf melmac 22:25, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
  34. Support. – AxSkov (☏) 09:16, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
  35. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 06:22, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

Oppose

Neutral

  1. Withdrawing until candidate accepts nominations and answer questions.

    Journalist C./ Holla @ me!


Comments

Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
A. The admin privileges that are most important to me are: deleting appropriately (both speedy candidates and failed AFD nominees), undeleting where necessary, and rolling back vandalism.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A. I'm especially proud of my contributions to the areas of Celtic linguistics, the field I know most about. The contributions to Irish phonology are almost entirely mine; its current state can be compared with what it looked like before I started work on it.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A. Not too much. I had a fight with Miskin a couple months ago after calling one of his edits vandalism (I was provoked by a sarcastic comment in an edit summary of his). I later apologized for doing so. The experience taught me a lot about dealing with other editors with whom I disagree, and to be more careful about assuming good faith. My only other conflict was with Zivinbudas, who came into conflict with a lot of editors and wound up getting banned for a year. With him, I had tried placation and the voice of reason to no avail.