User talk:Render024
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Regarding your edits to Origins:
Your recent edit to Origins (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses, phone numbers, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, forum, or other such free-hosting website links to a non-talk page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 21:52, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Origins
Welcome to Wikipedia. Note that we need citations for any non-obvious facts. As Origins is not a well known bad, very few facts beyond their existance, and perhaps membership and albums released are obvious. For example, "They are generally considered alternative rock, with psychedelic, progressive and hardcore influences. They are known for their use of distorted noise and intensely improvised jams." Who generally consideres them that? Who knows them for their distorted noise and improvised jams. Absent such citations for third parties, such claims can be deleted by any editor at any time. (You can usually include claims by the group themselves, so long as it's phrased properly and includes a citation. "Origins describes their style as alternative rock, with psychedelic, progressive and hardcore influences.") Furthermore I recommend seeking out third party coverage of the band (especially in the form of articles about them; possibly reviews). Absent any reliable sources, some of the editors who err on the side of exclusion move to delete the article, believing the group to not be notable. Third party coverage from a few reliable sources will pretty much ensure that the Origins article survives, as well as providing some useful facts to exand the article with. — Alan De Smet | Talk 22:21, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
In Image:GENESISALBUM.jpg you said, "Brandon Hardy, created myself". I conclude that you're the same Brandon Hardy in Origins and Brandon Hardy. If so, your enthusiam is appreciated, but editing articles about yourself is frowned upon. Your actions are going to be viewed with suspicion and likely advertising. Furthermore, I see you've created articles for the individual Origins albums and members. Frankly, those articles are highly likely to be deleted unless you can provide several reliable sources about the individuals or albums. Finally, the Origins article still needs citations! Non-obvious facts without citations can be deleted pretty much at any time. — Alan De Smet | Talk 01:31, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] "Anthrosects in Effigy EP"
A {{prod}} template has been added to the article "Anthrosects in Effigy EP", suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. LyrlTalk C 16:43, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:GENESISALBUM.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:GENESISALBUM.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:11, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
