Talk:Renuka Chowdhury

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Politics and government work group.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
WikiProject_India This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. (add comments)
This article is maintained by the Indian politics workgroup.

[edit] Domestic Violence Act

Recommend that SaveIndianFamily start a new Wiki on the Domestic Violence Act and write a proper critique there. Unbalancing the profile of Renuka Choudhury is a cheap shot. Again, the "Famous Quotes" are not relevant.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.254.104.78 (talkcontribs) 13:06, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WP:NPOV & WP:BLP - do no harm

The following has been removed for violating WP:NPOV & WP:BLP:

She is a known 'bad case' of extreme feminism.She was also seen defending pratibha patil in the 2007 presidential elections due to her being a woman.

Please be aware of the policy for writing biographies of living persons. Central to this policy is the term do no harm - "Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid; it is not our job to be sensationalist, or to be the primary vehicle for the spread of titillating claims about people's lives." This includes speculation about their motivations and/or actions. If any claims like the above are to be added to any BLP - they must be sourced and they must be worded in a conservative and neutral fashion. Failure to comply with this policy is a serious issue on wikipedia and can result in warnings and blocks (template warnings such as {{blp2}} are far from trivial)--Cailil talk 15:07, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Removed ICDS section as utterly unsourced. What is believed about a person cannot be added to wikipedia. Only what is sourced and uncontravertial - see WP:BLP--Cailil talk 13:45, 30 March 2008 (UTC)