Talk:Rendition aircraft

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

AVIATION This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Note: This article, Rendition aircraft, has been expanded and renamed from an earlier aircraft-specific article, N44982. The comments below, dated from before 2007, all refer to the earlier, single-aircraft version. Akradecki 00:11, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

An ambitious first attempt to a biography of this mysterious gost aircraft. there are alot of information availiable out there but it needs cross confirming. Its not an atempt to reveal any conspiracy theory badged whith aviational facts an confirmed fligth logs, tough i some times is nessecary to mention speculatuion as they are what brougt this aircraft to public attention. notable dates

also the article needs condensing formatting and grammar check by native speakers http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/05/25/opinion/main619513.shtml http://www.tkb.org/NewsStory.jsp?storyID=58830

http://www.nowpublic.com/node/1609

Contents

[edit] NPOV

Use of "kidnapping" in reference to "delivery (kidnapping) of detainees" and "outsourcing torture" in reference to "undisclosed foreign or secret locations for advanced interrogation" have given this article a POV tone. Though it is supports by the article quoted, it doesn't provide absolute truth or fact to make such claims, as well the article for the most part has a non neutral, and a speculative not informative tone. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 10:36, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)

its gone

[edit] Image in this article might get deleted

This article currently uses an image (Image:560175.jpg) which has been tagged with {{permission}}, but was uploaded after May 19, 2005. Such images are supposed to be deleted (See related mail from Jimbo). Please check if the use of image qualifies as fair use and if applicable replace the current tag with one of the fair use tags in conjunction with {{withpermission}}. --Fritz S. (Talk) 14:32, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tail number listed as current is longer registered

I just did a check on the FAA site and the tail number N44982 is no longer registered. [1] Does anyone know what this has been changed to? --LoganCale (talk | contribs) 15:34, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] merge from N987SA

(per User:Victor falk#N987SA) The references have to be inlined. --victor falk 19:45, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Additional information

I dont have the time, but this should be mentioned. Also, there is some information at Blackwater Worldwide businesses that should be integrated into this article. - Tmaull (talk) 18:56, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Cleanup

It is good that this article is being expanded to cover rendition aircraft in general and not a single mysteriose aircraft, however information is being added haphazerdly. This article needs to be cleaned up to make the article easier to understand, as it is it's more of an extended list of variouse suspected rendition aircraft. (and please be careful to cite sources and maintain neutaral POV.) F-451 (talk) 00:17, 16 May 2008 (UTC)