User talk:Remilyp90
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The article Tim gillespie has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. FreplySpang 04:17, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Speedy deletion of Tim Gillespie
A tag has been placed on Tim Gillespie requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Triwbe (talk) 04:46, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Nonsense of Max Ehrenfreund
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Max Ehrenfreund, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Max Ehrenfreund provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Max Ehrenfreund, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 05:01, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] May 2008
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Colt 45. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. EnviroboyTalkCs 06:17, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Colt 45. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. EnviroboyTalkCs 06:17, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Colt 45.
Any further vandalism will result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. EnviroboyTalkCs 06:28, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Re:Vandalism?
New message for you on my talk page. EnviroboyTalkCs 06:45, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Ingrid ockert
A tag has been placed on Ingrid ockert requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. —BradV 21:21, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Vandalism-only
Ian Cairns (talk) 23:14, 27 May 2008 (UTC)