Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations/Held nominations

In this page, articles being considered for the current Release Version cycle are debated, if a member of the Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Review Team has a concern about the importance of a topic. Articles placed on this page are reviewed by a larger group of users, which then decide whether to include the article to the current release, to hold it for a future release cycle, or to fail it completely due to quality concerns (which entails a new nomination after improvements have been made).

[edit] Nomination procedures

==={{la|Article}}===
  Number of votes: 1/0/0
<!-- Remember to update the vote counter when you place your vote! -->
; Hold:
# ~~~~ 
 
; Include:
#

; Fail:
#

; Discussion:
----

[edit] How to vote

There are three sections under which you can place your signature (~~~~). There is the hold section, for articles that you believe do not merit inclusion in the current release version cycle due to importance concerns only. If you believe an article satisfies both quality and importance criteria, comment in the include section.

If you believe an article has issues with quality only, please use the fail section. Ideally, these articles should not come to this page; members of the 1.0 review team are encouraged to fail the articles directly, to allow them to be fixed up for inclusion in the current release cycle.

Don't forget to add a reason to why you commented the way you did, whether it be with your signature, or ideally, in the discussion section of each nomination. The discussion is the most important part of the review process.

[edit] Current Nominations

[edit] Board game (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

 Number of votes: 1/0/1

Stub ??. Lincher 23:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Hold

Include

Fail

1. -RunningOnBrains 07:26, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Discussion

[edit] Church (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

 Number of votes: 1/0/1

Stub. Lincher 23:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Hold

Include

Fail

1. -RunningOnBrains 07:38, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Discussion

• Important enough to include, but far too short. -RunningOnBrains 07:51, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Church (building) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

 Number of votes: 2/0/0

Start. Lincher 23:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Hold

1. -RunningOnBrains 07:45, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Include

Fail

Discussion

• A short section on this should exist at main church article; don't believe this is important enough. -RunningOnBrains 07:45, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Civil liberties (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)}

 Number of votes: 1/0/2

Stub, Bias. Lincher 23:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Hold

Include

Fail

1. Start, needs a lot of work. Walkerma 02:43, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
2. -RunningOnBrains 07:47, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Discussion

[edit] Percy Henn (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

 Number of votes: 2/0/0

Original nomination: Definitely deserves an inclusion. Almost GA. Auroranorth (WikiDesk) 11:13, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

The topic is not important enough to be included this time. Walkerma 05:09, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Hold

1. Nice article, but not notable enough for this version.-RunningOnBrains 19:23, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Include

Fail

Discussion

[edit] Bradley Joseph (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

 Number of votes: 1/1/0

Added to held page by Ozgod. Titoxd^{(?!? - cool stuff)} 22:54, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Hold

Include

1. Cricket02 15:48, 2 July 2007 (UTC) Comprehensive biography on an American composer, FA/mid.
2. LuciferMorgan (talk) 17:47, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Fail

Discussion

[edit] South Australian legislative election, 2006 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

 Number of votes: 1/0/0

Original nomination: The South Australian 2006 election which saw the Liberal Party of Australias worst election result in SA history. Is an FA article. Timeshift 12:05, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

There are more important SA topics that need to be included first Walkerma 03:41, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Hold

1. Titoxd^{(?!? - cool stuff)} 02:09, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Include

Fail

Discussion

• Its scope is extremely limited, sadly. Titoxd^{(?!? - cool stuff)} 02:09, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Voyage: Inspired by Jules Verne (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

 Number of votes: 3/0/0

Original nomination: This article has recently been upgraded to A-class and is almost certainly going to be upgraded to FA-status. It is currently undergoing FAC and all comments have been addressed, as have those from the WikiProject CVG assessment, which gave it A-class. While some may say that it is not of the utmost importance, the number of really good adventure game articles is quite lacking, so having some good adventure game articles is probably a good move. Quality wise the article is excellent.--Paaerduag 13:13, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Hold

1. No interwikis, very few links in, and this does not seem to be a particularly important game. I'd like to see us eventually make a DVD on computer games - let's hold it until then. Walkerma 02:48, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
2. The main point for holding is the importance, I can't see this as being of much use in the next release. AndrewJDTALK -- 09:53, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Include

Fail

Discussion

[edit] Fathers and Sons (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

 Number of votes: 1/2/0

Hold

1. Eyu100^{(t|fr|Version 1.0 Editorial Team)} 16:03, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Include

1. We will need some more novels - and this is the greatest work of an important author. Walkerma 02:15, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
2. Agree. Cricket02 15:52, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
3. Definitely. Titoxd^{(?!? - cool stuff)} 02:07, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
4. Per Walkerma AndrewJDTALK -- 22:33, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Fail

Discussion

[edit] Kurt Vonnegut (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

1. User:Doc Strange^{User talk:Doc StrangeVersion 1.0 Editorial Team} 19:44, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Include

[edit] Kansas Turnpike (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

 Number of votes: 1/0/0

FA, but not sure if it is important or significant enough for a worldwide scope.

Hold

1. O₂ (息 • 吹) 01:23, 03 November 2007 (GMT)

Include

Fail

Discussion

[edit] Visual Basic (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

 Number of votes: 1/0/0

Hold

1. Ivan Akira (talk) 10:24, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Include

Fail

Discussion

[edit] Sherlock Holmes (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

 Number of votes: 1/0/0

I think this is a good article to add to version 0.7. Because of Sherlock Holmes novels are widely known in England.

Hold

1. Ivan Akira (talk) 10:24, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Include

Fail

Discussion

[edit] Archives

Closed nominations go here. Archive 1