Image talk:Religion importance.PNG
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I think the colors a badly chosen. I think they should consist of a gradual color shift, instead. Also, the light blue color is too similar to the gray. 惑乱 分からん 19:27, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] The Vatican
Surely the Vatican should be 90%?
- Who are you calling Shirley? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by AnYoNe! (talk • contribs) 21:29, 11 May 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Colours
The colour scale is not only difficult to conceptualise, but the blues and greys are too similar. Yuk!
[edit] Data
I question the data here, and the omissions of several "Western" nations from this chart make it meaningless for comparison's sake. Australia, Spain, Saudi Arabia and Iran jump out. Surely, a more recent report has shown these nations's religious devotion? -- Nhprman 22:35, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] "very important"?
come on, this literally doesn't mean anything, most normal people consider Physics to be "very important" yet make no effort to be knowlegable about it. --AnYoNe! 21:28, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Map is limited
This map seems to only examine a very narrow demographic, and a limited number of countries. Perhaos this should be removed from from Wikipedia's Religion page. User:Notecardforfree 23:49, 3 June 2007 (PST)
[edit] Reference
I'm currently looking for this kind of data, if anyone can point me towards a graphical/database construction of religious intensity in the world I would really appreciate it.
1)patterns can be used to improve contrast
2) WHAT ABOUT THE MIDDLE EAST? THE MAP HAS A BIG HOLE THERE. FOR FIRST LOOK IT APPEARS LIKE THEY ARE ATHEISTS!
````