User talk:Reisender

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Titoweb.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Titoweb.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:29, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Repeated vandalism

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Marija_Šerifović, you will be blocked from editing. Removing a sourced statement is considered vandalism, as you have been told many times already. What is more, you're in breach of WP:3RR. JdeJ 02:58, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Marija_Šerifović, you will be blocked from editing. Please consult WP:3RR. JdeJ 18:26, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked for edit warring

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:J broz.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:J broz.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:19, 19 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Thuresson 00:19, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Possibly unfree Image:Matthaeus.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Matthaeus.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Thuresson 00:24, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Warning

Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Marija_Šerifović, you will be blocked from editing. JdeJ 06:06, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Assuming good faith, I'll try to explain this. Removing a sourced statement is considered vandalism on Wikipedia. That does not mean that such statements cannot be removed, but then the burden of proof is on the remover. Just removing it for the reason of not believing in it is not enough, a sourced statement generally has preference over a personal opinion. You have removed the same sourced statement eleven times now, and you have both been warned and blocked for it. I hope you decide to participate in a more constructive way by engaging in discussions and contributing to articles. JdeJ 06:15, 19 May 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Please stop vandalising

This is your last warning. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Marija_Šerifović, you will be blocked from editing. Look, you don't evade the rules just by repeating your vandalism less often than three times a day. Vandalism is vandalism regardless of frequency, and you have been told many times that removing a sourced statement is vandalism. Yet you continue. As you have very few other contributions on Wikipedia, it looks more and more as if you're only here to vandalise. Pleast stop. JdeJ 01:44, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 72 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated.--Wafulz 15:20, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Jbtito.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jbtito.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:24, 25 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yonatan talk 03:24, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Who's the author of the photo? Yonatan talk 03:25, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Reisender for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.

JdeJ 22:48, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Commercial use of Image:Josiptito.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Josiptito.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Josiptito.jpg is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Josiptito.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 20:33, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Jugosloveni.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Jugosloveni.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:04, 30 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. The Evil Spartan 01:04, 30 August 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:800px-LocationIraq svg.png

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:800px-LocationIraq svg.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:49, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Jugosloveni.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Jugosloveni.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:43, 30 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. The Evil Spartan (talk) 17:43, 30 December 2007 (UTC)