User talk:ReinaB

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This user is a suspected sock puppet of PatA51, and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to editing habits and/or contributions; this policy subsection may also be helpful.

Account information: block log – current autoblocks – edits – logs

This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

Abusing multiple accounts

  • Decline reason:

You have not been autoblocked. However, you have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock|your_reason_here}} to your talk page. -- Yamla 15:47, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

ReinB

I am not connected in any way with PatA51. I

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I only have one account. I have not been sockpuppeting and I do not know who PatA51 is. Whatever reason that user has been blocked I am not involved."

Decline reason: "Looking at your edit history, this is simply not the case. One account stops editing and the other starts within minutes. Clear case of sockpuppetry. — Yamla 15:53, 11 October 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

[edit] Proposed deletion of Beatrice LeSeur

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Beatrice LeSeur, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Magioladitis (talk) 12:37, 7 May 2008 (UTC)