User talk:Rehevkor/Archive 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

Coheed and Cambria

There has been repeated and detailed discussion of the genre best fitting Coheed and Cambria. Only the band themselves and diehard fans believe them to be progressive rock without any modifiers whatsoever. However, nearly every major musical publication and critical entity regards them as pop-prog, emo-prog, or just emo. You need to step up and apply some editorial clarity to this issue and stop letting fans push POV. I'm going to keep reverting to the revision that best fits the citations and journalistic classification until you get off your ass.

Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.34.217.190 (talk) 22:26, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Thundermaster

Hi you just posted sumthing on my talk page but i'm not thundermaster Jay794 (talk) 15:51, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Yep! It was in reply to the tag he posted. Rehevkor (talk) 15:54, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

But why was it on my talkpage? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jay794 (talk • contribs) 16:22, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Um. Discussions on talk pages don't go between multiple's talk pages? If it's an issue you're free to delete it. Rehevkor (talk) 16:25, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

No its ok, I just got confused because I thought u thought I was thundermaster Jay794 (talk) 17:23, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Uru: Ages Beyond Myst Soundtrack

Hello there. I noticed that you have changed the title of an album article I had been working on, to the words (or possible title) that are seen on the cover of the album. I considered doing this at first, but the album is listed in several places online as being "Uru: Ages Beyond Myst Official Soundtrack", including on the company's official Web site, and at the listing they created for it in Cyan's Amazon.com zShop. This is why I decided to title it "Uru: Ages Beyond Myst Official Soundtack" rather than "Uru Music" as it says on the cover. The title is also more fitting with the naming convention of the rest of the soundtracks in the series. Here are a couple of links: The Cyan zShop Listing, and Cyan's official Web site. It's not a big deal, but I thought I'd see what you thought after looking at the links. The About.com review I used as a reference for the article also states the album's title as "Uru: Ages Beyond Myst Soundtrack". Also, I thought it was a great idea to add the Myst soundtrack chronology in addition to the composers' individual chronologies!

--Justin Norman 05:37, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

The thinking behind it was really like the naming of the Myst soundtrack Myst: The Soundtrack, rather than just Myst Soundtrack or something, or "Myst (Video Game Soundtrack)" as Amazon lists it [1]. It's personal preference really, I'd rather the page be named after the actual title of the CD, rather than listings online. My thinking was such listings are only named so there's no confusion as to what the CD is, "Uru Music" is a rather vague title, but it's not an issue on Wikipedia. I'll leave it to you though, you created the page so you have first dibs on the name. :P

--¬rehevkor¬

Ah, I forgot to get back to you about this. I just wanted to say thanks for checking the links, and I think your way of titling is probably a bit more accurate, so I'll leave it the way that it is. Also, good idea compressing the soundtrack links in the Myst franchise box. It looks a bit less cluttered now!

--Justin Norman 22:25, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Leroy (South Park)

Per your post on the talk page you may wanna see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leroy (South Park), thanks! Glen 09:59, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Dont push it. When the album comes out it can show its notability. Danny 01:05, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

War Angels

War Angels has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt the subject might not be notable enough for an article. Please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability for the relevant guidelines. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 04:25, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

MCR AfD

Just because you don't like a band doesn't mean you have to vote to delete about 16 articles about songs by them Mcr616 23:01, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

I like MCR. Just because you like a band doesn't mean you have to vote to keep them. Rehevkor 00:57, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Hey

Hey, thanks for joining the 'heed WikiProject, I was just getting round to inviting people, and as I've noticed you have taken care editing the Coheed articles, you would probably have been the first person I'd have asked ^_^ Glad to have you aboard. ≈ The Haunted Angel 01:44, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

It's Goin' Down (X-Ecutioners song)‎

I think it would qualify, because it features them heavily on the track. It's got Mike on vox, Phoenix on Bass, Rob on Drums, Mr. Hahn on Scratching, and Brad and Chester featured in the video (all members of Linkin Park). It also features Wayne Static of Static-X on Guitar, so it could probably be tagged as a Static-X song as well, as he's featured heavily as well. I'm not saying it's LP's track only or anything, but since they're featured, I think it should be tagged with them. What do you think about it? Jay 05:33, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

But it's still not a Linkin Park song.. should all A Perfect Circle songs be tagged as Tool songs because they share a member? Start a "Songs with members of Linkin Park in them" category if you want, it still won't make it a Linkin Park song. Linkin Park != X-Ecutioners. Rehevkor 12:14, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Coheed and Cambria

Hi, I'm part of the Wikiproject Coheed and Cambria and I noticed you have made some edits to the Coheed and Cambria page, so I thought you might be interested in joining! Thanks, and I hope you join! Jackrm talk 28 July 2007, 09:01 (UTC)

Thanks for the invite, but I'm already on board.. second name down on the list I believe. :P Rehevkor 20:09, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
So you are, haha. Sorry! Being tired and wikipedia editing isn't always the best combination! Jackrm 23:28, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:Sikth deathofadeadday.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sikth deathofadeadday.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:33, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Evans Blue

On August 19th you removed a section in Misc explaining what the acrostic tattoo on Matisyn's arm said, but left the part about him saying 'it's an acrostic.' What's the point of that? If you're going to mention that it's an acrostic, and you know what the acrostic is, why wouldn't you tell what it is? You've essentially left it as a puzzle without the solution. If you didn't like the way the explanation was written, you should've just re-written it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.90.33.243 (talk) 20:53, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Um.. I guess it was a mistake on my part? Yet you're assumg bad faith? Either way, the information was pointlessly trivial and unsourced. I'll delete it properly this time. Thanks for letting me know. Rehevkor 21:23, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

I wasn't assuming bad faith, I was just confused about the edit. Thanks for clarifying. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.90.33.243 (talk) 16:05, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

HL Ep. 2

[2] See there, state your view. ScarianTalk 17:13, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Coheed and Cambria

Hey, great work on the Coheed articles. I'm trying to get the article to Featured article standards. It's well written in my opinion, it just needs more references, so if you feel like searching the web for references to what's written there, please help! — jacĸrм (talk) 19:06, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Coheed and Cambria

I added you as a editor who "may be able to help with questions about verification and sources" for Coheed and Cambria [3]. I hope you don't mind, feel free to remove yourself, but as one of the main editors of the Coheed articles, I felt you fit this well. I am hoping it will improve the article in the future. Thanks, — jacĸrм (talk) 00:19, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

To be fair.. I don't really claim to be be particularity knowledgeable of the band, I'm just a fan. But I'm happy to do what I can. Rehevkor 19:11, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Well you also have a good knowledge of Wikipedia and know where to find sources. :) — jacĸrм (talk) 19:12, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Portal date

Hello, could you tell me which bit of WP:DATES were you referring to when you reverted the date on Portal? Thanks. - X201 15:31, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

WP:DATES#Autoformatting_and_linking:
  • Wikipedia has articles on days of the year, years, decades, centuries and millennia. Link to one of these pages only if it is likely to deepen readers' understanding of a topic. [emphasis mine] Piped links to pages that are more focused on a topic are possible (1997), but cannot be used in full dates, where they break the date-linking function.

Rehevkor 15:59, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Spoilers

Ah, that does make sense, sorry for reverting it. Before spoiler tags use to be everywhere so I was going with that trend. Now that I looked through a cake more articles, I noticed that plot synopsis now lack any spoiler tags. And it does make sense so, sorry for being stupid. =p --DrunkCat 19:33, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

OK

Sorry for my recent edit to Fear Factory. I was not aware my edit would be considered vandalism and I will put more thought into edits now. Sorry for this edit. Thundermaster367 (talk) 09:26, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Talking?

You didn't really explain it did you? Why the heck did you add the message to the top of the damn page is what I can't understand. And also, the only other editor you discussed it with was one who also removed it multiple times without even having discussed it on the talk or leaving at edit summary multiple times. The genre has been there for ages. Listen to their albums, you complete twit. They basically defined groove metal. You're just removing a genre that perfectly defines Fear Factory. And by the way, I'm not the one starting the debate am I? I'm just putting back a genre that a twit like you has removed. ThundermasterThundermaster's Talk 14:50, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Please see Talk:Fear_Factory#Groove_Metal for the reasons why it was removed. I cannot talk for other editors. Also, I didn't add it to the top of the page. Not every single edit had to be discussed, the fact is he was reverting your unexplained edits. Rehevkor (talk) 15:28, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
No he started it by removing it the first time, which I reverted, then he de-reverted it etc. So no, he started it. 86.155.162.127 (talk) 17:30, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
I removed it. As per the discussion, the one you ignored by claiming our edits were undiscussed by adding Uw-delete1 to both our talk pages which is unconstructive and, quite frankly, insulting. Rehevkor (talk) 17:35, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
So you removed it first time, without explanation? Because if you did, me placing the tag was perfectly justified. And also, you say the tags are for repeat offences and they could be considered offensive. I know of your extensive use of these tags. ThundermasterThundermaster's Talk 08:41, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
I removed it. After the discussion. How hard is that to understand? My extensive use? I've used them once, when you repeatedly added unsourced information to the article. Rehevkor (talk) 14:42, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Re: Master Passion Greed

I decided against salting at the last minute, but now my decision was made easier. :-) east.718 at 18:04, January 18, 2008

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Machinae Supremacy.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Machinae Supremacy.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:27, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Inja_players.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Inja_players.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 15:57, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Pablo Bertorello

Friend, I mean nothing against you. This article was already on the BLP noticeboard, as you probably know. If you wanted to AfD it, it might have been good to say something there first. AfD can be harsh and may drive off the one to three editors involved. Gimmetrow 04:22, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Nope, wasn't aware it was on the BLP board.. Rehevkor (talk) 04:29, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
OK. I just figured you came to this article from checking my contribs and/or talk page. See WP:BLP/N#Pablo_Bertorello. Gimmetrow 04:35, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Archive + d

Wonderful idea! Things were certainly getting overcrowded! Not so now! :) --Candlewicke Consortiums Limited 00:27, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Sorry for just stuffing my comment in here at the bottom, but I wasn't very sure where it would fit in... Anyway, the back cover of Riven claims that it is 'Not suitable for windows XP'. I wish I was wrong, but as far as I know, it's the only myst game I'm unable to play because it hasn't been re-released. If you're 100% certain that it can be played on XP please inform me because I'll rush out to a shop and buy it right away. Thanks. Porlock6 (talk)

It could be, of course, that they're just saying that it wouldn't be good for Windows XP. I could try the first copy I got of Exile which used to also be non-compatible but which I never got round to trying out on my XP. If it works I guess Riven will work also. Anyway, thanks for replying! Porlock6 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 19:58, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Glados ---> WCC

If you look at the images whilst the credits go by, you can see that it is definitely the Weighted Companion Cube. It makes a reference to 'being thrown in a fire', which has only occured to the WCC, and the images back this up totally. If you do not have the game I suggest you search for it on YouTube and you will see for yourself that such is the case. αѕєηιηє t/c 14:31, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

I have actually played the game - four times over. I now realise that I am wrong, and I apologise for the inconvenience. I forgot about the endgame incineration. αѕєηιηє t/c 15:44, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Tone tagging for Elizabeth Hall Nash Barnard

Hi Rehevkor,

I noticed you just added a "tone" tag to Elizabeth Hall Nash Barnard, but I don't find any associated comments on that article's talk page as the template suggests. Could I perhaps trouble you to put some more comprehensive (than what was in the edit summary) comments there to aid in improving the article?--Xover (talk) 15:39, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Improving Half-Life (video game) to Featured Article status

I am currently improving Half-Life (video game) to Featured Article status and noticed that you have made substantial contributions to the article recently. If you have time, please help out by improving the article however you can. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 00:13, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Your warning here

I left my warning when you had reverted the most recent vandalism. So, your vandalism-3 warning came without the user making anymore edits. Sorry if that caused some confusion. Leebo T/C 21:37, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Re: Revert

[4] - Feel free to remove the POV from that addition then :-) Thanks. ScarianCall me Pat! 16:24, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Err... bit more... "only" needs to be bombed too. ScarianCall me Pat! 17:14, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Yes, but still... ":-)" - You wanted it in there. You reap the seeds you sow, my friend. Ultimately, it's your judgement that allowed it to slip inside which is, quite frankly, disappointing. You like my smileys, huh? Have some more! :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) There we go! Ha en bra dag, din arsle. (Have a nice day in Swedish!) ScarianCall me Pat! 17:47, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

First of all, I'm an admin, so I don't need to conform to that. Secondly, insult me again and you will be blocked (Not by me, of course) for personal attacks. Please read WP:NPA. Thirdly, I originally reverted because POV is a big NO NO, okej? Lastly, I was not being condescending, I was being friendly. I always use smileys. You've started to piss me off big time. ScarianCall me Pat! 18:32, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Re: Revert

Yeah I know, don't worry I saw it :) ≈ The Haunted Angel 21:02, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.