Talk:Rehman Automobile and Works

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject_India This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. (add comments)
More information about this article...
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject India because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WP India}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WP India}} template, removing {{WP India}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

[edit] Discussion

[edit] All the sources are from validated Government of Pakistan documents.

Dear Administrator, Please do not delete this page as it contains information related to a company that does not exist and therefore is not for a use of publicity. The information was requested to be placed by a number of students from Pakistan as a part of their study. The company holds great importance as it was the first acid accumulator battery in Pakistan. Please do not delete. I have added the references and the quotations are from published governmental records. Thanking you in anticipation.

Yours sincerely, Contributor

Now that you've pestered me into becoming involved with this, you'll have to bear the consequences. This article has no sources that would make it verifiable according to Wikipedia policy. It is not enough to merely put quotation marks around something -- the material has to be properly sourced such that it would be available for checking by other editors. Since it has been speedy-deleted four times by my count, and has been tagged again, you seem to be wasting the time of everyone concerned. I intend to delete this and to make it impossible to be recreated unless someone comes up with a relevant argument as to why not, or if another editor intervenes on your behalf. I've made a note to come back to this in about eight hours. Accounting4Taste 00:05, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
It has been deleted twice and recreated twice [1]. - Caribbean~H.Q. 00:26, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for bringing that to my attention, and I apologize for not reading more carefully -- that does change the situation somewhat, since it puts it below the threshold at which I automatically salt a recreation. I'm still hoping to hear some valid reason why this would be kept. Accounting4Taste 01:01, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
And it is not considered appropriate to delete other people's comments from talk pages, either. Accounting4Taste 14:46, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Does this company still exist?

The article does not mention whether the company is still in existence. That information is pretty important. I can't find anything with my limited resources. ... discospinster talk 23:52, 2 December 2007 (UTC)