Talk:Regional Science High School Union
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I'm not sure about the formatting of this article. In line with similar lists it should be cut down (no frame around images, smaller table cells etc.) Just ideas! --Errant Tmorton166(Talk)(Review me) 09:55, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] As regards to the validity of some parts of the article.
I am a graduate of one of the RSHS listed in the article that is RTPM-DSHS, RSHS for Region VII. What is questionable is that most of what the curriculum mentions as covered in the instruction isn't actually in fact taught. Perhaps in the plans and program structure, these are inputs, but say for example, the choice to select a chosen major has never been implemented in our entire school's existence of around 16-17 years!!!
Perhaps in other closely regulated RSHS this may in fact be implemented, but to my knowledge this does not apply to our school. I will attempt to list down these inconsistencies in my next post. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sabbathunlimited (talk • contribs) 09:16, 10 January 2007 (UTC).
who edited this??????? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.127.48.169 (talk) 04:47, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Errors
i'm an RSHS-I graduate and i observed that there were some quite erronous entries in this page.
1)Curricullum
2)NAT top 10 placing University of Assumption of san fernando city on top place.i don't even know if that school really exists. and would just like to reiterate that NAT is implemeted by dep ed only for PUBLIC SCHOOLS! therefore how could there be a private school on the top spot. that's so ridiculous. i don't know the purpose of the person of edited it maybe just to give confusion to wikipedia readers. "HOY! kung sino man yun MAHIYA ka sa Sarili MO!". i've already edited this entry and replace it with a factual entry which is Lope De Vega NHS.
Let me remind to all people who are editing articles here in wikipedia to please just enter informations which are FACTUAL. this is an online encyclopedia and it should give TRUE and CREDIBLE informations to it's users.
with this i want to request the administrators of wikipedia to please be more stricter with regards to editing pages.