Talk:Regino C. Hermosisima, Jr.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

	This article is within the scope of Tambayan Philippines, the WikiProject and notice board for topics related to the Philippines. To participate, visit the Tambayan for more information.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

--Florentino floro (talk) 08:28, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The Filipino Magistrate who Changed History

From Banilad Cebu, Regino C. Hermosisima, Jr. is the only justice in the world who incarcerated the accused who were already acquitted by final judgment by the Marcos Sandiganbayan, thereby, making history in world criminal jurisprudence on double jeopardy. His ponencia is now 24 years old final and the 14 accused had been in jail for 24 years.

--Florentino floro 15:54, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 2 Rare Handwritten and Signed Letters of Justice Hermosisima, Jr.

These 2 letters are the only LETTERS handwritten by Justice Hermosisima,Jr.,and NONE can be found elsewhere, so I uploaded these to show the very elaborate handwriting and signature of this most powerful jurist.

--Florentino floro (talk) 07:41, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] POV Check

Specifically, the "2 guns" section reads as if it has an agenda. Beeblbrox (talk) 14:52, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Due to inexperience in editing, I merely copied the titles of the inquirer lead report on the 2 guns. Why? Since, these 2 guns, legally speaking really, were the cream of cream of the case, considering the 2,000 exhibits (tons or truckloads of). Usually, we editors cannot describe best our edit, except by copying verbatim some parts of the titles of the reports. Often, journalists who are specialists on communication deprive us editors of using better words from thesaurus. Copyright laws would stop us from copying the entire reports verbatim, so we use our own words. A cursory perusal of the article reveals that as creator and editor or contributor, I merely used my own words to comply with copyright laws. Anyway, borrowing the "2 guns" from Inquirer.net[1] might even be a copyright violation rather than violation of neutrality or POV. But I could not find better words to portray the legal angle of the case, since the guns are part and parcel of corpus delicti to prove the body of the crime. For legal experts and magistrates, using or borrowing these 2 words from Inquirer.net is good edit, since there could be no better words to edit the section. - --Florentino floro (talk) 09:10, 5 April 2008 (UTC)