Talk:Reginald fitz Jocelin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article Reginald fitz Jocelin has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
March 5, 2008 Good article nominee Listed


This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

[edit] GA nomination notice

I'm pretty much the principle editor on this page, and I nominated it for GA status. I'm on vacation this weekend, so will be much less available than usual. I should still be available, but figured I should drop a note here to let folks know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ealdgyth (talkcontribs) 19:10, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] GA passed

I think this is an excellent article, and I only have a few minor suggestions for its improvement.

  • I assume there are no images of Reginald?
None that I've found on Commons. ODNB says there is a seal extant, but I don't have access to it. Ealdgyth | Talk 01:07, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
  • In the first section, the phrase "some historians say . . ." it would read better if you give names of these historians here.
Will do! Ealdgyth | Talk 01:07, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Is there more to say about his time as Bishop of Bath? He was in the post for twenty years.
After I completed most of the research on the current version, I came across some journal articles, that I will get worked into the article before I attempt to take it to FA. As far as I've been able to find, there is no good history of the medieval bishops of Bath, so it is a case of gathering very scattered information together, which takes time. Ealdgyth | Talk 01:07, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

In all, good job--Jackyd101 (talk) 23:11, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks much! Ealdgyth | Talk 01:07, 6 March 2008 (UTC)