Talk:Regge calculus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Physics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics.

Help with this template This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Physics because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{Physics}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{Physics}} template, removing {{Physics}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

The redirect to calculus is not at all appropriate. Charles Matthews 16:05, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)

This article cries out for a link to a new page with a pictorial explanation of angular deficits. I intend to create such a page in a few days. Hillman 29 May 2005

[edit] Einstein-Hilbert action etc.

I know virtually nothing about Regge calculus, but have read a few reviews recently and the idea of a discrete analogue of the classical Einstein-Hilbert action (obtained by summing deficit angles, multiplying by areas etc., or something like that) seems to crop up time and again. Perhaps this is worthy of mention. ---Mpatel (talk) 10:50, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Students beware

I had long planned to improve this article and made a few edits to an earlier version. I had also been monitoring it for bad edits, but I am leaving the WP and am now abandoning this article to its fate.

Just wanted to provide notice that I am only responsible (in part) for the last version I edited; see User:Hillman/Archive. I emphatically do not vouch for anything you might see in more recent versions, although I hope for the best.

Good luck in your search for information, regardless!---CH 03:17, 1 July 2006 (UTC)