Talk:Refused
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to musicians and musical groups on Wikipedia. | ||
 |
The article on Refused is supported by WikiProject Sweden, which is an attempt to improve the quality and coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page; if you have any questions about the project or the article ratings below, please consult the FAQ. |
|---|---|
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale. |
Contents |
[edit] Layout
I'm think that making a page for each LP and EP, much like pages for other bands is in order now that we have a bit more information on the band. Any thoughts? stiner 16:01, Dec 6, 2004 (UTC)
You (or we) should split the main Eps and albums. I think it has to be easy for a person seeking information about the band.
I agree. I don't like the layouts that have the EPs and/or singles mixed in with the LPs. Is there any sort of style guide that explicitly says how its "supposed" to be done?
stiner 05:44, Dec 8, 2004 (UTC)
Also, just looking at the page again, we need to do some serious clean-up after User:Chriscorey added tons of info. Perhaps someone should make a point to fix up the layout.
User:Notransistory - I split up the albums and EPs and gave each of the albums a separate page - so if there are any mistakes, please fix them! I hope it looks a bit better now!
I agree, it does look better. I'm thinking about creating a page for each of the EPs/MCDs entrys just to keep up with consistency. Maybe also creating a new page for "Shape of.." to its correct title "Shape Of Punk To Come: A Chimerical Bombination In 12 Bursts"
chriscorey 21:20, Jun 15, 2005
[edit] Band names requiring pluralized verbs
The reasons for this are discussed extensively on User:Mike Garcia's talk page. —Tarnas 03:13, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] No references to Fugazi?
This band is clearly influenced by Fugazi, but there is only a mention to the Washintong D.C band "Nation of Ulysses" what I think it is fair. It is not that I am a Fugazi's fan, I am not. But it seems more than clear that Fugazi IS the influence for all these post-hardcore bands and it is not even mentioned.
I hope you find constructive this argument.
I agree completely. This should be mentioned. Indie -0 04:32, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] the newspaper burning
any insight as to who, flamed everyone, about how is Refused is dead, and that people should stop asking questions, and how it is over, but not really?
[edit] self-promotion
hey, I deleted a blatantly obvious self-promotion bit at the end of the Final Communique section, reading as such:
.....a local new york band, better days does a superb cover of "rather be dead"
seconds after I did so, the TawkerBot2 reverted the article to last revision. what happened? anything that can be done to bypass that? 68.186.57.226 05:08, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
- The bots screw up a lot. I saw Antivandalbot revert someone's edit on Crust punk when they added Anal Cunt to the related artists section. I'll go make the edit. Since I'm not an anonymous editor it probably won't revert me. BTW, this entire article is shameless self-promotion. I just don't have the energy right now to do anything about it. But if someone else does, go ahead and clean it up. Ungovernable ForceThe Wiki Kitchen! 05:32, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] contradiction
how can they be hardcore and post-hardcore? they dont exist in two differnt time periods plus they arent post-hardcore. Avenged Evanfold 09:06, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Because they'd changed completely by their last album. The Shape of Punk to Come is indisputably post-Hardcore. Sexycaterpiller167
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Refusedband.jpg
Image:Refusedband.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:04, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Singles
Has anyone got any information on any singles they released? Titan50 (talk) 13:39, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Anarcho-Punks?
they are in the Category:Anarcho-punk, but.. how is that? I don't think they were anarcho-punk, they might have been vegan and might have had some songs inspired by the situationists, but call them anarcho-punks. IIRC they were aired on MTV. I don't think they embrace the anarcho-punk values. Am i wrong? If so, please leave some sources or comments, otherwise I will be removing them from that category in a couple of days. -Cacuija (my talk) 01:01, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
