User talk:Redux

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Redux Archives

---

Hi! Welcome to Wikipedia. When you get a chance, drop us a note at Wikipedia:New user log to introduce yourself.

If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.

You can sign your name on talk pages by using " ~~~ " for your username and " ~~~~ " for your username and a timestamp.

Welcome is a good place to start. Wikipedia:How does one edit a page gives editing help. Wikipedia:Manual of Style gives formatting info. Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines tell about the principles we operate on. It's important, but don't try to read it all now. Wikipedia:Help covers a broad range of useful topics. Wikipedia:Village pump is a place to ask questions. Wikipedia:Show preview explains how to double-check your edits before saving.

You should also feel free to drop me a question on my talk page. I'll answer if I'm here.

Happy editing, Isomorphic 04:10, 8 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Congratulations, you're an admin! Please try to be conservative in the use of your new capabilities. Best regards, The Uninvited Co., Inc. 22:41, 28 July 2005 (UTC)

You're now a bureaucrat, so jump in and help out where you can. Follow the discussions at the bureaucrat's noticeboard and use your new powers for good of course. :) - Taxman ^Talk 15:08, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Ok, after I pestered Suisi, she gave you the oversite bit. Happy editing. Raul654 00:03, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Hi Redux. As requested on meta, your check-user flag is now active.

Please subscribe to checkuser-l and email checkuser-l-owner@wikipedia.org so that the listadmins know that you are allowed on the mailing list. (The list may contain confidential information). Bye. --Paginazero 06:35, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Rollback

It seems from your latest post to the Bureaucrat noticeboard that you haven't seen how fast this issue has moved. Administrators were given the ability to assign and remove "rollback" permissions a few days ago, see the user rights log [1] or the new Requests for rollback board. WjBscribe 03:05, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Both Jimbo and Anthere have commented on the implementation - Jimbo here and Anthere here. WjBscribe 17:37, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Dooku.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Dooku.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:19, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Senate front.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Senate front.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:18, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Senate.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Senate.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:18, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Y Done Redux (talk) 14:17, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sai de Baixo DVD.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sai de Baixo DVD.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:16, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Y Done Redux (talk) 14:17, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sai de Baixo I.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sai de Baixo I.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:18, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Y Done Redux (talk) 14:17, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sai de Baixo II.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sai de Baixo II.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:20, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Y Done Redux (talk) 14:17, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sai de Baixo III.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sai de Baixo III.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:21, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Y Done Redux (talk) 14:17, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Saint Silvester 05.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Saint Silvester 05.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:58, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Y Done Redux (talk) 16:06, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sonic shower.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sonic shower.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:30, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Y Done. Boy, those old uploads are turning out to be a real handful... ;) Redux (talk) 16:01, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Timeofyourlife.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Timeofyourlife.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:28, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Y Done I changed the template in use to {{fairusein|ARTICLENAME}}, which includes the name of the article where fair use is claimed. I believe that takes care of the concern... Redux (talk) 13:40, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cidade dos Homens 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cidade dos Homens 1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:48, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Y Done Redux (talk) 16:02, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cidade dos Homens 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cidade dos Homens 2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:49, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Y Done Redux (talk) 16:02, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cidade dos Homens 3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cidade dos Homens 3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:51, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Y Done Redux (talk) 16:02, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cidade dos Homens 4.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cidade dos Homens 4.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:53, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Y Done Redux (talk) 16:02, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Charitas.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Charitas.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:29, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

I've ascertained that it is reasonably possible to obtain a free similar. Despite the fact that the image is used in promotional touristic material,since this image is not free and the copyright holder is uncertain and difficult to determine, I have nuked the image myself. Redux (talk) 16:14, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:City of Men.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:City of Men.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:49, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Y Done Redux (talk) 16:02, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WP:CHU#Bradsoroka → Brad Soroka

Generally the practice is to leave a note asking them to confirm the request, rather than rejecting it and requiring a new request. I've merged the two requests so that they are archived together when the other one is accepted; I'll undo this if you have any objection. —Random832 17:25, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

If it works, no problem. We used to ask for logged-in confirmation, until we created the template. After the template's inception, we started declining requests that failed to follow the basic instructions. Declining and asking people to repost when the basic instructions are not followed also served the purpose of preventing people from trying to fix the links in the template, which would normally only make it worse. In order to optimize the time the Bcrats would spend in renames, we were making it clear that if a user didn't take the time to read simple instructions, the requests would be denied, which would cause people to read the instructions, thus preventing silly mistakes that caused us to take more and more time to handle simple requests.
Most of this, however, was before clerks started helping out with renames. With the help of the clerks, there's less of a need for us to be too concerned with wasting time fixing silly mistakes. But I guess I was on "automatic". Thanks for the help.
As a matter of fact, you don't even need to wait until the repost is accepted (if it hasn't been already by now, I haven't checked), you can go ahead and merge now, if you want to. Cheers, Redux (talk) 22:56, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

I meant I'd already merged it, actually (converting your "not done" to a "bureaucrat note" to prevent premature archiving as denied). I'm considering changing the template at some point, actually (maybe to a two-stage template to where one template subst's and there's another template hiding all the urlencode complexity) to make fixing the links easier (generally it only gets halfway fixed when CURRENT and NEW are left in place) —Random832 23:04, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hi!

Rename me, please, from Russkij to Andrijko Z. (with dot) --Russkij (talk) 13:42, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Admin

Can you train me so I can be closer to having a chance of becoming an admin. --Some people are gay. Get over it! 19:36, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Saint Silvester 05.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Saint Silvester 05.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:29, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] User talk:S marky 90

This guy has made several edits to Venice Marco Polo Airport that are a bit odd such as adding this section. I don't think that they are vandalising and they do seem willing to communicate, User talk:CambridgeBayWeather#Review. Based on what they are editing I am guessing they speak Italian and wondered if you could try and see what they are up to before someone blocks them. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 17:19, 19 February 2008 (UTC) Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 14:18, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Shespies.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Shespies.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 18:54, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Y Done Redux (talk) 02:47, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Split infinitve on Lewis page

Just got your message. I read the page on s.i.'s differently than you, it would seem. But I see your solution - moving "successfully" to the end - as the easiest thing here. I was more concerned with emphasizing "defence" here but was too lazy to make the one change... Feel free to go back and clean up the text to make it read more encyclopedic. (The page still needs to be re-jigged as the "controversies" section really is a bit of a mess.) Cheers. Canada Jack (talk) 04:17, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Bureaucrat discussion - Wikipedia:Requests for bureaucratship/Riana

Wikipedia:Requests for bureaucratship/Riana/Bureaucrat discussion

Having briefly discussed this request with Deskana and as we did not think this is a case where a lone bureaucrat should determine the outcome of the discussion, I have created a subpage to allow for bureaucrats to discuss the matter. If you have time, I would be grateful if you could review the RfB and express an opinion as to what outcome you believe is appropriate. WjBscribe 02:22, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Petropolis Imperial Museum.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Petropolis Imperial Museum.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:10, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

The image I had uploaded has been replaced with a completely different version, uploaded by Limongi. I've verified that the user has been notified as well. Since the image he uploaded is not a different version of the previous image, but rather a different image altogether, this will have to be looked into by him. Redux (talk) 16:55, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Obiwan.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Obiwan.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:26, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Y Done Redux (talk) 16:55, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Obiwan1.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Obiwan1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:28, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Someone else seems to have already taken care of it. Redux (talk) 16:55, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:NYM.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:NYM.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:18, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Someone else seems to have already taken care of it. Redux (talk) 16:55, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mandrake 1.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Mandrake 1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:19, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Y Done Redux (talk) 16:55, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mandrake 2.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Mandrake 2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:20, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Y Done Redux (talk) 16:55, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mandrake 3.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Mandrake 3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:21, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Y Done Redux (talk) 16:55, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mandrake 5.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Mandrake 5.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:22, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Y Done Redux (talk) 16:55, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Possibly unfree Image:Brasil Bandeira.gif

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Brasil Bandeira.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. αѕєηιηє ^t/_c 07:56, 16 March 2008 (UTC) --αѕєηιηє ^t/_c 07:56, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Tone correction thanks

Belated thanks for correcting my tone on the 2008 Aussie GP article; that was written when I was half-awake at the end of the race (US F1 fans lose a lot of sleep!) and had just heard Bob Varsha mention it, using the "debacle" terminology. I must remember to be very careful about Wiki-ing when I'm sleep-deprived! Rdfox 76 (talk) 13:59, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] How to login with my former username

Hi. Before some time you renamed my account from cyrilic to latin letters, thanks. But now, with the unified login system, I need it back. The problem is that I cannot login to my old account - User:Петър Петров - the password is not accepted and there is no email address active for this account. Can you/someone else help me — how can I login with my former username? Please reply to my talk page, thanks. --Petar Petrov (talk) 19:04, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi again. Thanks for your quick reply and cooperation. Most probably you are right about "you probably created a different password for it, and you might have forgotten all about it by now." — if the account Петър Петров was left free after renaming, I would re-create it to prevent abuse. In that case the password is gone, of course. Yes, please send the current User:Петър Петров account to some better place (/dev/null) and then move back User:Petar Petrov as User:Петър Петров. If necessary, I hereby agree to have both accounts userchecked. Thanks. --Petar Petrov (talk) 08:07, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Great, it seems I have to wait for Bug 13507... Until then, please ignore my request. --Petar Petrov (talk) 08:22, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

My global account was deleted. I have asked for account usurpation. --Petar Petrov (talk) 10:29, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Y Done: Usurpation completed, SUL account unified. Thanks for your support. --Петър Петров (talk) 13:57, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Spiritsjedi.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Spiritsjedi.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:14, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Benedict_XV.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Benedict_XV.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:54, 31 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 21:54, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

I nuked the image myself, thanks. It wasn't being used on any articles anyway. No need to keep it, then. Redux (talk) 14:29, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Misbehaviour by Volkovbot

VolkovBot (which you approved) vandalized http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leibniz_and_Newton_calculus_controversy. When I left a message on ru:User talk:VolkovBot as requested the page in Russian was incomprehensible and my signature Xxanthippe (talk) 23:06, 6 April 2008 (UTC) appeared as my IP number. Continued editing gave odd text behaviour and I had to reboot my computer to get things working again. I think this bot should be blocked on the English Wiki until its problems have been sorted out. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:06, 6 April 2008 (UTC).

This is interwiki link to Bengali wikipedia, not vandalism at all. --VolkovBot (talk) 06:44, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:BOC logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:BOC logo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sdrtirs (talk) 19:20, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Y Done Taken care of, thank you. Redux (talk) 15:50, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:BOC logo 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:BOC logo 2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sdrtirs (talk) 19:21, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Y Done Taken care of, thank you. Redux (talk) 15:50, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Sai_de_Baixo_IV.jpg

I have tagged Image:Sai_de_Baixo_IV.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 00:41, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Y Done Taken care of, thank you. Redux (talk) 17:35, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Sai_de_Baixo_V.jpg

I have tagged Image:Sai_de_Baixo_V.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 00:42, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Y Done Taken care of, thank you. Redux (talk) 17:35, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked IP Address still editting!!??

I recently blocked the ip. 202.1.192.1 and later noticed that it made another edit after i blocked the ip. how could this possibly happen. Please see the [print Scrn] i took. Also take this matter in to consideration and check how this happend. Thank you!

--~GlaCiouS~ (talk) 16:25, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Changing my username

Hello,
I registered myself under the username "Eldads" because "Eldad" seemed to be occupied. I believe the person who registered under that name had no contributions to Wikipedia. Could you please help me change my user name, in compliance with my user name in Hebrew and all the other Wikipedias? Thanking you in advance, Eldad (talk) 08:00, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Of course, "Eldads" can remain (as a redirection), but I prefer to have "Eldad" as my main user name. If it's not too much to ask, please leave me a short message on my Hebrew Wikipedia talk page, so that I know that you have addressed my request. Eldad (talk) 09:49, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

PS. I have just turned also to WJBscribe, as I'm not sure you are around. Hope it's Ok with you. Eldad (talk) 19:47, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

WJBscribe has just attended to my request. Thank you, too. Eldad (talk) 20:26, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] E-mail

Te enviei um e-mail. Fred Xavier (talk) 16:10, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Other possible tennis articles to be renamed

Arantxa Sanchez Vicario, Conchita Martinez, Cedric Pioline, Dominika Cibulkova, Francoise Durr, Goran Ivanisevic, Hana Mandlikova, Helena Sukova, Ilie Nastase, Jadwiga Jędrzejowska, Jan Kodes, Jana Novotna, Lilí de Álvarez, Mima Jaušovec, Renáta Tomanová, Věra Suková, Yola Ramírez, Zsuzsa Körmöczy. No doubt there are many more. See, e.g., List of female tennis players and List of male tennis players. Tennis expert (talk) 07:47, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

See also List of tennis tournaments. Tennis expert (talk) 07:49, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Indeed. Thanks. :) I only tried to make a note on the discussion on the talk pages of entries on some of the more prominent players that might need to be moved. No doubt it will take a team effort to both compile the full list of articles and to ultimately move all the articles that will need moving. Redux (talk) 14:42, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] RfB closure thanks

Hello, Redux.

I wanted to personally thank you for taking part in the discussion regarding the closure of my candidacy for bureaucratship. As you know, after your discussion, you decided that there was sufficient significant and varied opposition to my candidacy, and thus no consensus to promote. Although personally disappointed, I both understand and respect your decision, especially in light of historical conservatism the project has had when selecting its bureaucrats. As these discussions are specifically not mathematical, but qualitative as well, even after the discussions at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/RfB bar and Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/RfB bar, I fully understand that your collective decision here was based on "significant and varied" for which there is sufficient evidence. So, while I cannot say I am happy with the decision, I can say that I am satisfied with the care taken to make it, and accepting of your collective judgment. On a personal note, as I based the time between my first two RfB's on your third one, perhaps I may share in your "third-time charm" success, IF I decide to submit another candidacy. But as for now, that is in the indefinite future, if ever. Once again, thank you for your participation. -- Avi (talk) 21:24, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Brazilian football players turned into weasels

On 8 May 2008, a certain User:Drfubar tagged dozens of Brazilian football biographies as having {{weasel}} words, even when the articles contained only player statistics and basic data. Some Brazilian football player articles were also marked in the same manner by some IP user. Pode fazer alguma coisa neste caso?--Wloveral (talk) 22:18, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Many thanks and obrigado.--Wloveral (talk) 14:40, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

I think a lot of those articles and football articles in general are very bias. They contain person viewpoint mildly disguised behind tricky wording without any sources. Thank you for your message Redux, i have read up on weasel words and found that whilst all the pages marked of me are occurring in bias, weasel words are perhaps not the best choice of marker in many respects. I apologise for any inconvenience about this but i think the perspective of many of these articles needs to be examined carefully. The trouble with many of the less major article on footballers is that only a few people know specific data/info about them, therefore they will be rarely edited looked at. This generally means in many cases they hold a strong bias as they have had just one or a couple of writers/workers. I began looking at Brazilian footballers as this is an area of knowledge i have. I will go over them again and place more appropriate tags and raise discussion on the relevant talk pages! Thank you! Oh and the ip edits were also me, i forgot to log in. Drfubar (talk) 19:39, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Maybe what we have in many of these Brazilian (and other nationalities) football player biography articles is {{peacock}}. --Wloveral (talk) 13:53, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Potential superpowers

Olá Redux! Há uma discussão ocorrendo em Talk:Potential superpowers#Removal of Brazil e gostaríamos da sua opinião. Obrigado pela atenção! Felipe C.S ^{( talk )} 00:16, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Humm, the discussion had already been closed by the time I found your link. Sorry. Redux (talk) 18:35, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Tennis

Hello Redux! I have moved several tennis articles to the titles with diacritics and now I see it was some discussion about it on WPP Tennis a while ago. Well, I think this case is much more wide than just tennis-centered and should be subjected to global discussion on WP. Several points are on my mind: 1.) No regional WikiProject has been notified about the proposed change. 2.) Indeed, it is a global issue, roughly there are tens of thousands articles with diacritics on WP. 3.) As for tennis articles, almost all interwikis use real names (with diacritics), it is unusual for EN Wiki to be the only one not using them. 4.) I see you are from Portugal, "de-diacritization" of articles would affect also Portuguese articles, e.g. Portimão and many others. 5.) Hope you will do good at Euro and beat Czechs in the group. ;)

I propose we can start somewhere a global discussion about this because current situation makes double standards and confusion. I remember when same issue was discussed at ice hockey WikiProject. Many players play NHL in the USA and are known by their "plain" names there, still the WPP decided to allow diacritics in titles. There are no problem since then and I'd like to point out that vast majority of project members are Americans and Canadians. Have a nice day and please let me know what we could do. I am also admin so we can make some joint initiative. Cheers. :) - Darwinek (talk) 20:34, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

I see your points, still I think regional wikiprojects should've been notified, after all not everybody follows WPP Tennis and related articles. I am afraid the point of "being known internationally in English as ..." is relative. On the ice hockey one, people admitted it is self-evident the names of e.g. Slavic players would be without diacritics since admins of NHL websites don't use Slavic keyboard. Main argument for allowing diacritics was that there is always diacritics-free redirect which allows other users easily find the article. Situation was also resolved by adding, e.g. ČĎĚ, (known in English as CDE) to the article lead. I respect your WPP Tennis discussion but personally I think some new poll should be arranged and all sides (to call it such) would be notified and invited. "Wikipedia is not a democracy" is only a rigid formula, truth is that voting is used throughout WP to determine and resolve many issues. This new voting has several advantages I see. First of all it would be binding. Second, it would be respected because of its clarity. And last but not least no one then could complain. After all, Jimmy made WP:IAR for exactly such situations. You may think I try to push your change back, honestly I favour diacritics but I will respect every voting outcome. Silent consensus of cca 8 people on WPP Tennis is not a solid foundation for the change. And honestly I don't know how this voting would end. Many users are pro-diacritics, many are anti, outcome would be maybe close, but fair. Therefore I propose we make a voting with clearly set rules (i.e. what majority to use) but not only a voting of "are you for or against?" but also to present the situation as you or WPP Tennis see it and the other side also, to introduce both sides' points to non-involved users. This would be fair, clear and outcome binding as I said before. - Darwinek (talk) 09:38, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Well, I see your points, specifically about the tennis-ice hockey difference. Truth is, it is a highly controversial measure to reject original spelling of someone's name in the name of English language which has nothing to do with individual's name. After all it will do only more trouble as the confusion with naming is high especially for newcomers. It is also not binding, therefore moving the article one way or another cannot be considered as vandalism. It will cause troubles till the day the rules will be widely discussed and properly altered to reflect the common sense and the real situation we have here. EN Wikipedia is English-language indeed but it is a flagship of all Wikipedias, beacon of "multi-everything", we both know this very good, right. :) As such it should lean towards tollerance of different/original variants of names. If there would be on EN Wiki only guys from the UK and the US, we wouldn't be discussing this thing. Current rules on naming are confusing, rigid and wrong. They will be changed in the future for sure, as no one is able to stop the progress which is a continual process which keeps rollin' and rollin'. Just look where was WP three years ago, also in the case of article names. It is hardly possible the same rules will be here after 10 years from now. - Darwinek (talk) 15:49, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Diacritics are used throughout Wikipedia, and they have been deemed compatible with UE NC policy. If one wishes to move an article to a non-diacritic version, a RM should be held, as this is certainly a controversial move.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 13:51, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

I am sure that in virtually every case, if you just look at popularity, the no diacritics version will be more popular. That does not make it more correct.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 20:55, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

And I will say again: your arguments are convincing, but you need to go through a WP:RM process. There have been objections, and I don't believe you have advertised the move widely (WP:VP], etc.).--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 09:33, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Hello Redux. Would you please chime in on this request? Thanks! Tennis expert (talk) 03:25, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

The request was granted: 1, 2. What is the point of spending a ton of time making these name changes if administrators and others are going to revert them, apparently without consequence? Darwinek has reverted about 15 name changes so far. Cheers. Tennis expert (talk) 06:19, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

A new request to Darwinek has been made but not yet granted. Tennis expert (talk) 06:30, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

That request also was granted. Tennis expert (talk) 17:14, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

The first note concerning a user's editing of English-language tennis player names has been placed on the Administrators' Noticeboard, here. Tennis expert (talk) 18:01, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Also, please see this and this. Tennis expert (talk) 07:49, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Redux, the renaming of the tennis articles is in the process of being undone. I did what I could, but now there's nothing more I can do about it. I'm being called names, having my good faith questioned, labeled as a disrupter, and threatened with blocks. Therefore, I am withdrawing from this exercise. I feel like I was left twisting slowly in the wind without support. But maybe that's just a personal failing of mine. Tennis expert (talk) 09:38, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Most of the undoing is recorded here Tennis expert (talk) 21:02, 1 June 2008 (UTC) and here. Tennis expert (talk) 14:14, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

See also this. Tennis expert (talk) 20:22, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Account created automatically

I have noticed that in Dhivehi Wikipedia there has been many automatically created users. I wonder what this mean? Please have a look at [2]. Thanks! Your help seeker, ;)

--~GlaCiouS~ (talk) 18:17, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Pedido urgente

Enviei um email pra ti. Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt ✉ 03:15, 28 May 2008 (UTC)