User talk:Redecke
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Thanks for the addition of a barogram to the barograph page. I was wondering if you could provide an image of a barograph to the article. I have been intending to add one but have not made the excursion to a distant sailplane airport to obtain an image. Thanks, Leonard G. 20:54, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Sorry Leonard ! I read your message only now. I will try to find a picture. Michael Redecke 22:20, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Neurophone article
Hi Redecke, thanks for correcting the article as I wasn't sure about the 3000 myself and had been waiting eagerly for days for someone else to come along and help me make this article. --JimmyT 05:12, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
- here in germany we would not write 3.000 V. it seems to me the way you write it over there. i think that it can be modified to simply "3 Volts". 3.000 V would implicate a very high precision in the range of 1 mV, which is not probable. michael Redecke 14:00, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
- ooh ! you just changed it yourself ! ok. michael Redecke 14:02, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
- I beat ya to it Dr. Redecke!! :) --JimmyT 15:07, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
Someone is trying to delete this article, can you make a vote and write at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neurophone. --JimmyT 11:51, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
- hello Jimmy ! i will take a look at that discussion. but at the same time i must say that i am very sceptic toward the statements i read concerning the neurophone ! i do not have much time at the moment to make a complete survey of the scientific literature available, but i will do my very best. regards, michael Redecke 13:58, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hello Michael
Habe dir etwas dermaßen deliziöses verlinkt, dass du unbedingt einen Blick darauf werfen solltest, please see: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vittorio_Emanuele%2C_Prince_of_Naples&action=history
Please also have a look auf die dazugehörige Diskussionsseite. Ich verzupf mich wieder, bevor hier der Edit-War-Weltkrieg ausbricht; weiß schon, das ist gemein, aber du packst das schon. Lieber Gruß Foreigner 15:48, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Ho gia risposto Foreigner
[edit] Enderlein
I'd be happy to review the translation for you. Midgley 21:23, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
- will start tomorrow. cheers, michael Redecke 21:28, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Interesting Selections
Hello Mr. Redecke.
I was a litle surprised because I found your colaboration in two articles that I was a reader.
In particulary the articles where,
_Ryke Geer Hamer
_HAARP
It surprisme because this too articles (themes) are hardly comments for Conspiracy Theorister. A would like to know your interesting on this themes since I would like your suports, comments and rewritting and other themes of this kind. This themes are:
-New World Order (conpiracy)
-Meta-Medicine : The same theories that claim germanic new medicine but with a more discreting and more support. In particular this last article (not yet created) has a lot of importance due the same matter that ryke hamer, because the dangeruos of the practice of this "medicine".
The people is adviced about hamer and gnm but, nobady knows that Meta-Medicine is the same (exactly) but with differents names that germanic new medicine. This is causing that Meta-Medicine spands quickly aroud the world, even with the support of famous actor that supports organization that are created for the Meta-Medicine group. In particular one of this organizations ist the Heal Breast Cancer organization. I require your good disposition if it is possible to redact this articles.
I sorry about my poor English.
Sky.
- Ola user "sky" (from Montevideo?)! As a german, my own knowledge of the english language is limited as well and i need often assistance writing contributions in english. I know about that "meta-medicine" and its links to the new germanic medicine, and i know that the inventor Ryke Geerd Hamer is since a long time upset about that what he calls a "copy" of his theory. But there are many other "copies" of the NGM around the world, for instance "biologie totale" by french Sabbah and other people. At the moment i cannot contribute because of too much work. But there are other people also well informed about that meta-medicine and i will ask someone else to be present here on my discussion-page. However: it would be the best for you to register (anonymous or not) here in the english (or any other spanish speaking wikipedia) to enable a stable contact for exchange of more information. Regards, Michael Redecke 11:49, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- Hallo Herr Redecke, Ich bin sehr zufrieden, weil Sie mich antwortet.
Ich gerade lerne deutsch, aber ich hoffe in etwas monaten besser zu sprechen.
Well, again sorry about my english and now my german :-). Thanks for answer me. I heared that there are another "copies", but I am focused on this because his support and giant size, that it seems nobady cares!. Well I'll wait (when you have the time) your comments on this media, until I enable my e-mail address.
Regards, WikiSky.
[edit] Georges Lakhovsky
Why is it that you keep tampering with the engineer reference / citation when all such references state that he was a scientist / engineer who invented experimental electronic devices? The person was born and educated in Russia prior to the Communist Revolution so that any such records (WP:RS) of his "engineering" school graduation would be nearly impossible to cite. Some IP editor keeps insisting that this G.L. person was a painter, but the painter's first and middle names are completely different. This G.L. is completely different than the painter. The IP user inserted a precise date for this G.L.'s birth, however Googling research shows no other web sources placing this G.L.'s DOB so accurately. Oldspammer 07:41, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Ryke Geerd Hamer
It might have been a more NPOV version back on 7 January than that which I first encountered on 25th February, but you have just gone and reverted my attempts to improve its awful English, remove ® mark as per WP:MOSTM policy, reorder sections to a more standard sequence, add cited conventional medicine criticism of the method, etc - Thanks a lot :-( David Ruben Talk 02:31, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- I've had a go at keeping to your short less WP:Peacock loaded verson, but working up English wikimarkup & citations as previously done :-) David Ruben Talk 03:19, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
