User talk:RedAndr

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, RedAndr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  Mak (talk) 04:54, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] License tagging for Image:OH orb5.png

Thanks for uploading Image:OH orb5.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:15, 27 February 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Your edit to Idiopathic Giant Cell Myocarditis

[edit] Message posted on Friday, April 27, 2007

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Idiopathic Giant Cell Myocarditis. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (http://heart.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/93/1/119 in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Idiopathic Giant Cell Myocarditis with a link to where we can find that note;
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Idiopathic Giant Cell Myocarditis with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Idiopathic Giant Cell Myocarditis saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Your original contributions are welcome.

-- lucasbfr talk 18:49, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

The article was rewritten. RedAndr 01:20, 28 April 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Your edit to Blitz++

[edit] Message posted on Friday, May 11, 2007

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Blitz++. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (http://sourceforge.net/projects/blitz/ in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Blitz++ with a link to where we can find that note;
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Blitz++ with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Blitz++ saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

Knowpedia 18:48, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

The Blitz++ is under the GNU General Public License and Artistic licence as it is written on the Legal page and can be freely copied. RedAndr 19:59, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
I disagree with your assessment. While the software is released under the GPL, there is no indication of a documentation release under GFDL. I know, this is picky. When rewriting the article, please keep in mind our WP:Notability guidelines, and assert the importance of the subject. I am noting your claim of absence of copyright and removing the speedy deletion tag to put the possible

copyright violation notice. -- lucasbfr talk 20:11, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

What about README file, which is distributed inside the program package? Can it be considered as a part of the program? May I cite it? RedAndr 21:48, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Use and modification of your cholesterol model image

Hi RedAndr, I hope you don't mind, but I was playing with making my first userboxes and used one of your images as it had a GNU license. I've credited you fully on the modified (miniaturised) image and linked to your original, but I realise now I should have asked you first. Sorry about that. The modified image is at Image:Cholesterol_mini_model.jpg and the userbox is here.

I hope you give me permission to use it in this way, as I think it's rather nice for a second attempt.

BTW, for some reason, even though it is clearly there, your image source page at Image:Cholesterol_Spacefill.jpeg says that no image of that name exists (the image tab is red and the edit tab when accessed says "Wikipedia does not have a Image page with this exact title". I don't know why that is, maybe it needs checking out in case it's about to be deleted. It's a fantastic image.

Thanks Drywontonmee 04:28, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Yes, sure. You can use my images whatever you'd like. I'll be only happy it could be useful :)
Concerning the problem with image tab it's because the image is actually loaded on the Wikimedia Commons, here: Image:Cholesterol Spacefill.jpeg. And the Wikipedia just references to it.
Thanks for you message and kind words :)) RedAndr 15:02, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Oh, I seeeeeeee. Thanks very much - Drywontonmee 07:04, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome!

If you are interested in Russia-related themes, you may want to check out the Russia Portal, particularly the Portal:Russia/New article announcements and Portal:Russia/Russia-related Wikipedia notice board. You may even want to add these boards to your watchlist.

Again, welcome! Alex Bakharev 00:43, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Notability of Antoine Berman

A tag has been placed on Antoine Berman, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. WebHamster 02:57, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] BZR

Hi, sorry for having to wait, but now I uploaded some of the BZR picture onto WIKI-Commons ... cu JKrieger (german wikipedia) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.65.154.13 (talk) 10:51, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! RedAndr 00:14, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Chico (cat)

A tag has been placed on Chico (cat), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Phgao 01:49, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

See my reply: Talk:Chico (cat) RedAndr 02:10, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bourqui, Michel

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Bourqui, Michel, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}.

Are you Michel Bourqui? --B. Wolterding 09:40, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

No, he's my supervisor. RedAndr

[edit] FAMULUS

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article FAMULUS, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of FAMULUS. J Milburn (talk) 17:32, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of FAMULUS

An editor has nominated FAMULUS, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FAMULUS and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 15:59, 14 January 2008 (UTC)