User:Red Thunder/Archive3
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Stormtracker94 | Awards | Userboxes | Talk |
|---|
CommentDear WikiProject Boston Red Sox members: I don't think this is spam, so I am going to say it. I just wanted to alert all of the members of this WikiProject (currently only five, besides myself) that I just got the Red Sox Wiki up and running, if you would like to check it out. It's in its infancy, so there's not much there yet, however. Thanks! --jj137 (Talk) 01:56, 15 October 2007 (UTC) Thank YouThank you soooo much! I can't wait to see the top bar and logo. Not to be picky but shake in some colour if you can! Ciao! --Rallyinspired 23:11, 15 October 2007 (UTC) Signpost updated for October 15th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 10:15, 16 October 2007 (UTC) Template:concept automobileThere is no need to attach this template indiscriminately, as you did to ten Mitsubishi-related articles. (And no others, apparently. Why such a manufacturer-specific approach?) The template is a warning device to readers, to alert them to this fact when the article may be written in such a way that it is not clear. Where an article begins "The <car name> is a concept car...", and is categorised in Category:Concept automobiles, and has many references, it is clear that the reader is being informed, not misled, and therefore to include the template is redundant. Regards, --DeLarge 09:11, 17 October 2007 (UTC) WestSide ChurchCan you please tell me why my article was considered for deletion? (In lay-man terms) Also, would you be able to help me sought out how the article can be removed from being deleted? If it is because the Church is not notable as far as you are concerned, would you mind helping me out sought out how I can show that it is notable? Thanks Spillon 01:59, 23 October 2007 (UTC) RfAI have closed your RfA using WP:SNOW guidelines, please feel free to apply again in 3 or more months time. Thanks and see you around! Phgao 05:45, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
BarnstarThank you my friend! Most kind, and always appreciated! Pedro : Chat 21:24, 25 October 2007 (UTC) BarnstarThanks you! Much appreciated. Hut 8.5 14:59, 27 October 2007 (UTC) Signpost updated for October 22nd, 2007.
Sorry for the tardiness in sending the Signpost this week. --Ral315 You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 14:54, 29 October 2007 (UTC) Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Daytonlogo.gifThanks for uploading Image:Daytonlogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:34, 29 October 2007 (UTC) Signpost updated for October 29th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:16, 1 November 2007 (UTC) The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
My barnstarThank you very much! How kind of you to notice. It struck me the other day that I had been awarded 4 barnstars, 2 by legitimate editors and 2 by vandals (!), so now at least the legitimate barnstars are back in front... Warmest regards, BencherliteTalk 22:11, 6 November 2007 (UTC) Manual of StylePlease read Wikipedia’s Manual of Style. Only proper nouns and the first word in article names are capitalized. You have been moving a lot of pages lately, and they have to be moved back. – Zntrip 00:05, 8 November 2007 (UTC) VandalsHello, Stormtracker94. I see you have been reverting a lot of vandalism recently, perhaps you could warn vandals with the following templates: {{subst:uw-v1}} {{subst:uw-v2}} {{subst:uw-v3}} {{subst:uw-v4}} {{subst:uw-v4im}} {{subst:bv}} Please try them out in the sandbox. Thanks. Happy editing! Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 23:43, 9 November 2007 (UTC) hi. —Preceding unsigned comment added by New York Dreams (talk • contribs) 04:30, 13 November 2007 (UTC) Signpost updated for November 5th and 12th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:24, 13 November 2007 (UTC) Signpost updated for November 19th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:45, 20 November 2007 (UTC) Thank you!For my star! Yey! :D delldot talk 22:06, 20 November 2007 (UTC) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
