Talk:Red Shift (novel)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to narrative novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions. | ||
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class. | ||
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. | ||
 |
This article is supported by the Fantasy task force. (with unknown importance) | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
Contents |
[edit] Style
This article badly needs rewriting - it reads like a review more than anything else. User:Belzub
- Duly taken care of. Djdaedalus 19:29, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
- Nice peice of work just made couple of minor tweeks. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 16:32, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks. Do you think it's ready for B-class ? Djdaedalus 17:06, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Names of the Celtic tribes - "Cats" and "Mothers."
I just happened to read this article having been a fan of the book since watching the BBC dramatisation.
While I agree the "Cheshire Cat" allusion fits, and is a good pun, I wonder is Garner also referencing two actual Celtic tribal names from the region - the Catuvellauni and Brigantes?
Granted the Catuvellauni were based around Hertfordshire, so it might be stretching it.
The Brigantes were the tribe of the Mother Goddess Brigantia, so in common speech they might easily have been nick-named "the Mothers." Ne?
Just a thought.
[edit] the last two pages
the last two pages are written in code the code in which they are written is mentioned earlier in the book. i no longer obtain a copy of the book but shortly after i read it i learnt the code. to find it out search lewis carroll —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 58.178.164.118 (talk) 07:23, 11 December 2006 (UTC).
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:AlanGarner RedShift.jpg
Image:AlanGarner RedShift.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:12, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] "an Englishman's perception of Vietnam-era military jargon"???
Is "Vietnam-era" a sensible phrase to use, given that it's not in widespread use in the UK given Britain's non-participation? Why not simply "1970s"? 86.143.52.241 01:26, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
An excerpt of a review printed on the back of the original British paperback - the one pictured in the main article - mentioned that the Roman soldiers talked like GIs in Vietnam. Britain didn't participate, but it was widely covered at the time, in the years Garner was writing Red Shift. The fact that Garner allowed the quote on the book's cover suggests that the reviewer was correct. Garner was making an analogy between the Roman occupation of Britain and America's involvement in Vietnam. RossyG 12:46, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:AlanGarner RedShift.jpg
Image:AlanGarner RedShift.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 18:41, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
