Talk:Red River Valley Research Corridor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject North Dakota, a WikiProject which aims to improve all articles related to North Dakota.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
Mid	This article is on a subject of Mid-importance within North Dakota articles.
This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

[edit] Selling NDSU short again?

NDSU is the larger research institution. You'd never know that from reading this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.2.242.82 (talk • contribs)

I'm not sure what you mean. This article contains material about research at both universities. If you feel that NDSU is somehow under represented, I would encourage you to include worthwhile material. --MatthewUND^(talk) 22:27, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

I was wondering why NDSU is listed after UND. Is there a reasoning behind this? NDSU has a larger research budget and stronger research presence than UND. Is it just bias again, or some other actual fact or figures you're going by. Also I noticed that the picture on the page is a building that is not in UND's technology park. Any reason for including that as well? Possibly trying to make UND seem better? Sorry to keep bring these things up... but it should be addressed... If I get some time, I'll try to get an image or two of NDSU's tech park... MatthewNDSU (talk) 07:05, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Citations

Do I need to place citations after each paragraph or after each section that uses the same reference (as I did)? --NDState 03:15, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Generally, each paragraph can have multiple citations. It is often unlikely that one source will cover every claim made in a paragraph. --MatthewUND^(talk) 03:21, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Very nice additions in the NDSU area... thanks --NDState 04:00, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

I've neglected this article in the past. I think we've been making some good improvements today. We certainly have improved the references! --MatthewUND^(talk) 04:20, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

It is looking a lot better. Thanks for your help. --NDState 04:29, 4 October 2007 (UTC)