Template talk:Recentism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This template was considered for deletion on 2007 February 15. The result of the discussion was keep. |
|
This template was considered for deletion on 2008 January 9. The result of the discussion was nomination withdrawn. |
This is sheer templatomania. Let's delete it ASAP. Steinbach (fka Caesarion) 20:58, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] templatomania
Actually, I think it is fine as it is ... if people think it is useful then they should apply it to articles... but in case some people disagree, I have created a template to deal with the situation...
 |
Please try to keep template creation to a minimum.
|
yes?MPS 22:40, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] <noinclude>?
Who cares if the template is being considered for deletion? Nobody wants to see that on the article pages. The only people who should care are the ones who take care of the template. The article editors can remove the template themselves in case it gets deleted. I suggest that a <noinclude> tag be place on the tfd message. Diez2 16:29, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- Except that's not what's done for every single other template up for deletion? The message is placed there precisely to alert users of the template that it's up for deletion and not just the "caretakers." Since, you know, users might be affected by suddenly having a template disappear beneath them for no apparent reason. SnowFire 18:01, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
