Talk:Rebellion of Cao Qin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article Rebellion of Cao Qin has been listed as one of the good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
An entry from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on January 20, 2008.
January 20, 2008 Good article nominee Listed
This article is part of WikiProject China, a project to improve all China-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other China-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. (add comments)
This article is maintained by the Chinese history workgroup.
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
Middle Ages Icon Rebellion of Cao Qin is part of WikiProject Middle Ages, a project for the community of Wikipedians who are interested in the Middle Ages. For more information, see the project page and the newest articles.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.

Article Grading:
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.



 
This article is about a person, place, or concept whose name is originally rendered in Chinese characters; however the article does not have that version of its name in the article's lead paragraph, or in a template. Anyone who is knowledgeable enough with the original language is invited to assist in adding the Chinese script.

For more information, see Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Chinese), Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Japanese), or Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Korean).


[edit] GA Review

I'm happy to pass this article as GA, it is well written and properly sourced. Before attempting FA or similar however, the article would require a broader range of sources, as it is almost completely taken from a single reference. It would also be a good idea to make more of those red links blue to give a bit more context to the people involved. Very nice article, well done and congratulations.--Jackyd101 (talk) 13:14, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Awesome! Thank you; and you are right, I do need to find more sources about this battle.--Pericles of AthensTalk 17:26, 20 January 2008 (UTC)