Talk:Reassignment method

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The reassignment method warrants its own page, particularly when it contains this much information. However, I'd like to see more references to the early material and a description of why this method sucks (no formal description of the result of reassignment, no amplitude representation, plagued by numerical error) and why anyone would want to reassign a TFR explicitly rather than use a phase-based method of signal-component extraction (e.g. Carmona's). Fitz, can you delete all but one of your references? I don't think we need that many but if anyone then claims this is some obscure technique I'll back you up. Jon Harrop 12:01, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Oh, and I'd love to see a graphical example of reassignment. I do think it looks good even though I never found a use for it myself. Jon Harrop 12:03, 16 April 2007 (UTC)