User talk:RCHM
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
A tag has been placed on Meguiar's, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Steve (Slf67) talk 03:45, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Could you help me write this article?
Hello,
I was wondering if you would be willing to help me write either Seikichi_Iha or Shorin-ryu_Shido-kan. Tkjazzer 21:48, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Anime South
I would appreciate any comments you may have on the Anime South Deletion review page. -Animesouth 20:26, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- many of your contributions ARE problems. However, I don't see a problem with the entire existance of the article.
[edit] Behringer
I have edited and added more static sources to the controversy section. I hope the 12 at present stand up to your test. If not, please let me know what I could do to make it acceptable. Thanks, 48v 01:29, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the revision 48v 03:53, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Spam in Cerwin-Vega
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Cerwin-Vega, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Cerwin-Vega is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Cerwin-Vega, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 20:30, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
why do you think that the Xbox 360 has 16 bit depth audio playback? Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by DrDavidWright (talk • contribs) 00:11, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] NASIOC
Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article NASIOC, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 18:01, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of NASIOC
An editor has nominated NASIOC, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NASIOC and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 15:59, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
