User talk:Raymond arritt/Sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sandbox minus John Dillinger equals what?

Test. Raymond Arritt 02:36, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] General sandbox

Template:Wtf

[edit] Some templates

vandalblock

It has become apparent that your account is only being used for vandalism, so it has been blocked indefinitely.

anonblock|comments go here|sig=Raymond Arritt 03:45, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

To edit, please log in. Editing by anonymous users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled. Registered users, however, are still able to edit. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, you may email us using an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. In your email, please tell us your preferred username and an account will be created for you. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. -- Raymond Arritt 03:45, 5 August 2007 (UTC) Comments: comments go here

bbblock

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. ~~~~

comment5

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for repeatedly violating Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. If you wish to make neutral and unbiased contributions, feel free to do so after the block expires.

gblock|some reason or another|a millenium

You have been blocked for a period of a millenium for some reason or another. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. ~~~~

MIPblock (note -- case sensitive)

You have repeatedly been warned to stop vandalising articles on Wikipedia when you came here using other IPs. You have returned and continued that vandalism. You have now been blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you make further attempts to vandalise articles when the block expires, you may be subject to a longer block. All unconstructive edits you make will be quickly reverted.

userlinks Garofolo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log)

[edit] My templates

gblockIP | no particular reason | eternity and three quarters

This IP address has been blocked for a period of eternity and three quarters for no particular reason. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. ~~~~

coi-stern Bozo

You appear to have a close connection to the subject of the article Bozo that raises concerns about a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. Anyone with a conflict of interest must avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing articles related to you, your family or colleagues, your organization or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);

   and you must always:

4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you.

[edit] Block modified

Following discussion on the administrators' noticeboard, I have decreased the length of your block to two weeks. You have made some constructive edits, but please take care to follow both the letter and the spirit of the terms imposed by the Arbitration Committee as stated here and here. Raymond Arritt 00:41, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

gblock reason duration

You have been blocked for a period of duration for reason. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. ~~~~

You have been blocked for a period of 5 days for edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. Your use of a sockpuppet account (User:Weissundblau) to evade the three-revert rule shows that you knowingly and purposefully set out to evade the policy, so the block is longer than usual for a second violation of the rule. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Raymond Arritt 21:49, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

This user has been blocked indefinitely because this user has used one or more accounts abusively. The abuse of multiple accounts is prohibited; using new accounts to evade blocks or bans results in the block or ban being extended. (Account information: block log • suspected sockpuppets • confirmed socks)

You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours for persistent incivility and attacks toward other users. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Raymond Arritt 06:34, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Raymond Arritt 06:34, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Prefixindex

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Prefixindex/Raymond_arritt —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raymond arritt (talk • contribs) 05:55, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Today's featured article/October 12, 2007 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raymond arritt (talk • contribs) 03:52, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Modified 3RR

Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in any single article within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Please use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors.

[edit] editwar

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

[edit] joke

You have failed to get the joke. Failure to get the joke may lead to your being slapped with a trout, and repeated offenses could eventually result in your being set upon by a school of Chinook salmon. Additionally, a user who fails to appreciate irony, litotes, banter or other forms of wordplay may be considered a poopyhead. If necessary, pursue remedial training. Thank you. Raymond Arritt (talk) 17:58, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Time

pm
b
2008-06-10T22:05:25+00:00
10
e
f
10
10
05
10
k
Tuesday
06
6
o
p
q
Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:05:25 +0000
25
30
u
v
2
x
08
161
PM
B
C
Tue
E
June
22
22
I
J
K
1
Jun
2
O
P
Q
R
S
T
1213135525
V
24
X
2008
Z