Talk:Raymond Plouhar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Military work group.

[edit] NPOV

I think it's POV to say that this movie depicts the military as being "predatory". To my recollection, Michael Moore made no comments on the recruiting style of this man or his recruiting partner; these men were allowed to speak for themselves. This movie included Michael Moore interviewing and consuling a woman who had lost her son while he was in active duty in Iraq. It also contains depiction of Michael Moore distributing literature to members of congress in an attempt to get them to enlist their children in the military. It also contains footage of Moore showing support for a soldier who chose not to fight in Iraq. Saying that the movie is critical of the military is not accurate. It's more accurate to say that the movie is critical of Bush's war in Iraq. -- Andrew Parodi 00:49, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

  • Apparently, the soldiers thought it was critical of the military. Please feel free to correct as you see fit. bd2412 T 01:53, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Probably goes without saying that they'd think it was critical of the military. -- Andrew Parodi 10:02, 29 June 2006 (UTC)