Talk:Rawson Macharia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

The trial of Kenyatta was a decisive event for colonial Kenya (and the imperial project more generally). Its failure was indicative of colonial inability to either co-opt or defeat even moderate African nationalism, except by methods as unscrupulous as rather blatant perjury. Hythlodayeus 19:48, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, that was rather quick; I was pressed for time. I still am, but can make a better go of it now. The colonial theory appears to have been that Mau Mau was a creation of Kenyatta: so - it did not quite follow - Mau Mau lacked mass support, and its claims of grievance were false or non-serious. The Baring administration tried the case in an exceptionally mendacious manner; the centrepiece of its case was Rawson Macharia's testimony that he had been present at an oathing ceremony over which Kenyatta had presided. That testimony is provably unsound, and so, therefore, is the colonial theory. Informed opinion now holds that Mau Mau was independent of Kenyatta (See e.g. Anderson (2005), Histories of the Hanged: Britain’s Dirty War in Kenya and the End of Empire, Weidenfeld & Nicolson: London). This has consequences for the understanding of Mau Mau. Hythlodayeus 21:44, 9 November 2007 (UTC)