From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Unless I'm mistaken, you asked somewhere else whether you should just accept the losses to Star Fleet Universe coverage as inevitable or rally to defend what you have. I say to you: Rally! These are the actions of a single and disturbingly trigger-happy user, not the inescapable cold hand of deletionism come to bring down all that stands against it. --Kizor 01:48, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Contents
- 1 Lyran Star Empire
- 2 Star Trek ship classes
- 3 Your reversion of User:Den-dede's edit to 2007 Tabasco flood
- 4 Mobile, Alabama
- 5 AfD nomination of United Federation of Planets (Star Fleet Universe)
- 6 Signpost updated for January 28th, 2008.
- 7 Signpost updated for February 4th, 2008.
- 8 Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dpw-supes.gif
- 9 Signpost updated for February 11th, 2008.
- 10 Signpost updated for February 18th and 25th, 2008.
- 11 Signpost updated for March 3rd, 2008.
- 12 TfD nomination of Template:SFU Nation Alt
- 13 Signpost updated for March 13th and 17th, 2008.
- 14 Alpha Octant
- 15 AfD nomination of Interstellar Concordium
- 16 Signpost updated for March 24th, 2008.
- 17 AfD nomination of United Federation of Planets (Star Fleet Universe)
- 18 AfD nomination of Gorn Confederation
- 19 Signpost updated for March 31st, 2008.
- 20 article note
- 21 PS238
- 22 Signpost updated for April 7th and 14th, 2008.
- 23 Signpost updated for April 21st, 2008.
- 24 AT&T vandal strikes again
- 25 Signpost updated for May 2nd and 9th, 2008.
- 26 Signpost updated for May 12th, 2008.
- 27 Signpost updated for May 19th and 26th, 2008.
- 28 Signpost updated for June 2, 2008.
- 29 SCA.svg
|
[edit] Lyran Star Empire
A tag has been placed on Lyran Star Empire, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how Lyran Star Empire is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Lyran Star Empire saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. Gavin Collins 10:26, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Star Trek ship classes
The main problem that you faced was that your sources were sstrcitly non-canon (i.e. not from the screen series, but from secondary or tertiary authorities). It is the same frustration that was felt when the ships in the original Tech Manual were overtaken by the "History of Spaceflight" book, and that, in turn, was overwritten by TNG and by ST:E.
Also, since one man's meat is another man's poison, there will always be things that you think are non-fancruft which somneone else will fightr for tooth and nail, and things they detest that you support. This being so, the argument of "What aboutt hat article over there" is, in Wikipedia, the equivalent of a hopeless last-ditch, rather than a stalwart defence.
My sympathies, and please continue to contribute -- Simon Cursitor 08:06, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
I agree that the text in question did not belong in the article. I put that text in the Tabasco article. I would urge you to encourage prospective Wikipedia contributors by helping them get their text in the right place if it is encyclopedic but just in the wrong article. I know it takes more time than reverting but it can be quite off-putting to a new user if their text is simply deleted rather than fixed and put in the appropriate place.
Thanks!
--Richard 17:45, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks! I think that the grammar and such is still weak in a least a few spots and that is certainly not my strong suite. I've have my significant other read it a couple of times but his grammatical skills aren't much better than mine.(though compared to some of the crap I've seen on here, mine doesn't seem too bad) Otherwise I'm not sure, the intro may need more work, I've had the hardest time with it but it finally seems to be getting close to WP:LEAD standards. I hope that I've made it as inclusive as possible and haven't overlooked anyone. Just giving it an honest indepth assessment from your perspective would be a help, I look at it and it all begins to blur together at this point. I don't want to go too far and start screwing it up either, I been in summarizing and removal mode, which can be dangerous. I don't want to renominate it myself again, I got my feelings hurt last time(but I did see his point after I was done being offended and taking it personally) Altairisfar (talk) 10:48, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
- Hey, I finished that Amtrak reference, check it for accuracy, but I think you already had the basics there. Thanks for helping and please keep it coming. Altairisfar 23:08, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
- Despite what I said above, I decided to go ahead and renominate the article for WP:GA again, I hope that it can at least not be quick-failed this time. Altairisfar 07:44, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of United Federation of Planets (Star Fleet Universe)
United Federation of Planets (Star Fleet Universe), an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that United Federation of Planets (Star Fleet Universe) satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Federation of Planets (Star Fleet Universe) (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of United Federation of Planets (Star Fleet Universe) during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 21:56, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for January 28th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 04:10, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for February 4th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:32, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dpw-supes.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Dpw-supes.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:03, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for February 11th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:12, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for February 18th and 25th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:03, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for March 3rd, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:22, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] TfD nomination of Template:SFU Nation Alt
Template:SFU Nation Alt has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. fschoenm (talk) 17:27, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for March 13th and 17th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 23:37, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Alpha Octant
Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Alpha Octant, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 14:59, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Interstellar Concordium
An article that you have been involved in editing, Interstellar Concordium, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interstellar Concordium (2nd nomination). Thank you. Jobjörn (talk) 15:22, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for March 24th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:02, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of United Federation of Planets (Star Fleet Universe)
I have nominated United Federation of Planets (Star Fleet Universe), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Federation of Planets (Star Fleet Universe) (3rd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Jobjörn (talk) 20:12, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Gorn Confederation
An editor has nominated Gorn Confederation, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gorn Confederation (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:59, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for March 31st, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 21:51, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] article note
Klingon Empire (Star Fleet Universe) is up for deletion. just want to let you know. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 21:00, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi there! You've contributed to PS238 page in the past. I just updated it with details from the RPG. Fancy checking out my edit? Thanks. JustIgnoreMe (talk) 16:03, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for April 7th and 14th, 2008.
Sorry, it seems that the bot quit before completing its run last week. Here is the last two weeks' worth of Signpost. Ralbot (talk) 08:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for April 21st, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 16:24, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] AT&T vandal strikes again
It's been a while since the anonymous AT&T vandal has caused a stir, but this time he's come back with a vengance to the American Telephone & Telegraph and Bell System articles. KansasCity (talk) 00:51, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for May 2nd and 9th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:28, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for May 12th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:30, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for May 19th and 26th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:18, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for June 2, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:39, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] SCA.svg
Any luck finding out anything about the SCA CoA image? I enquired about it myself a while back (I think the email address I wrote to was questions@sca.org), but I never got any response. Wilhelm meis (talk) 03:04, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
