User talk:Rattis1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Rattis1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! RJFJR 04:02, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Your edit to Emalia Silver the Wolf
Your recent edit to Emalia Silver the Wolf (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 10:02, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Reply
As said on the talk page of Homer Simpson. Length is not necessarily a good thing. Homer and Bart's articles are good. We don't need an obsessive about of crud, describing every single in universe thing in their lives. It needs to be writte in an out of universe perspective, with only some in universe stuff. All of the other pages will be done eventually. Articles being "shorter" is not unacceptable. Quantity doesn't mean quality. Gran2 22:05, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Rattis, we got a Major problem
Marcus is on the loose again. I will do whatever it takes to let him pipe down and leave us all alone forever. Damn man, it's been a long time since you last talked in Wikipedia. We need your help once again. Start talking back the right way Rattis! Pronto! That Psycho Marcus really admitted he got such Syndrome but I still never bother about his diseases. Let's save the Powerpuff Girls again!
Rattis! We need you once again! This Marcus is on the loose! Please do something!
For another time again, Marcus is on the loose! Where are you when we need you?? Night Leon 05:17, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Geez! Marcus is back again but I'm not sure if he is going to start another war! He is known as mdaitch26 in the IMDB Board! Night Leon 07:25, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Powerpuff Girls: Movie (2/Remake)?
While "2Sucram" is temporarily away at the moment, I've been thinking about making an Interview with Craig McCracken himself in the future of maybe 2 or 3 years estimatedly. Do you think that he and his team should remake the Powerpuff Girls: Movie? Although one of the rate was high, it failed in Marketing and Publicity due to the Violence part of the Movie which made it stable meaning popular and not so popular at the same time. They should try to make the Violence part less menace so that it would be a family orientated film so everyone should be happy again EXCEPT for Marcorono. The Actresses and Actors should get higher pay for a remake movie though. Do you agree with me? It's ok if you don't because no matter what, the Powerpuff Girls will always be the best Cartoon among all the Cartoons in Cartoon Network. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Night Leon (talk • contribs) 06:41, August 26, 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Metal Sonic
I keep removing the part about Silver Sonic II from the "games"-section of the article because it has nothing to do with the games. Mentions of the various robotic Sonic incarnations in the comics belong in the "comics"-section. Nowhere else in the game-section of the article are the comics versions of robot Sonic's mentioned. And in order to keep the article uniform and simple to read, i feel that the paragraph about the Sonic Adventure-robot Sonic should be no exception. Rattis1 (talk) 19:01, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
-
- Though the character from the game influencing the comic, is not details of the comics chracter, but a detail of interest about a character in the game, who otherwise, really isn't worthy of his own section with the lack of anything other than: "He's in Sonic Adventure", I could understand if this "uniform" article idea waas applied to all Sonic The Hedeghog articles, with any mixed information being seperated into Games first and then comics, but because of influences on both, this wouldn't be possible! Doktor Wilhelm 20:35, 21 November 2007 (UTC)