Talk:Ratchet & Clank: Going Commando

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Famicom style controller This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article is on a subject of low priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0.
VG To-do:
Sony PlayStation Portal
This article is within the scope of the The PlayStation Project, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of PlayStation products. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
This article is supported by the Insomniac Task Force. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where

you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. (Portal)

[edit] RYNO2: No relation to the original RYNO

I have to say I was disappointed with the RYNO2, it had absolutely no connection to its predecessor weapon, the R.Y.N.O. (Rip Ya a New One), with the exception of the multitargeting. Hardly useful when the weapon only fires one projectile at a time, unlike the original, black market weapon, that fired ten missiles simultaneously. --Bear Eagleson 21:43, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Actually, the original RYNO fired 9, but yeah, the 2 sucks. I much prefer the other weapons. In fact, the Mini-Nuke is better because it can damage all the enemies around it. You can defeat the B2 Brawler in just around 5 hits with it. --RedZion 8:13, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Hang on! This aint a talk page ya know! It's not called the RYNO2 for a laugh. RYNO...then RYNO2...who cares if it's changed...there is no point to this at all. Insomniac made it that way, obviously. What am I doing? How did you get my number? Never call here again! Leemorrison 23:57, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

I think it's VERY GOOD! In the game it got me out of some tight spots. 20:27, 20 March 2007

[edit] Title

Why is the North American title of the game always referred to as Ratchet & Clank: Going Commando instead of Ratchet & Clank 2: Going Commando? Both the North American and European logo form the number 2, but only the European title gets a 2 (Ratchet & Clank 2: Locked and Loaded) when typed. Seems to me this article should be moved to Ratchet & Clank 2: Going Commando. --DT29 10 June 2006

Insomniac's website has it only as Ratchet & Clank: Going Commando [1], as well as the official site [2]. That's just the way it is. I can see the logo with the number "2" in it, but the company uses it without it. Thunderbrand 16:24, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Ratchetclankcommando 111303 145.jpg

Image:Ratchetclankcommando 111303 145.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:24, 5 December 2007 (UTC)