Talk:Rapist
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Re: Removal of "female" specification
If there's going to be a specification for "male", shouldn't there be a specification for "female"?Murderbike 00:26, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
and now that i look at it again, i don't understand for removal of the section on male rapist profiles, whilst the female rapist profiles section exists. barring any arguments, i'm readding it. Murderbike 00:45, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Female rapist classification
The section on categorizing female rapists seems to rely exclusively on statutory rape. Was this intentional? Perhaps it should be changed?
[edit] Why?
The why section is incoherent and useless. There are all sorts of excellent studies and research on this issue, and yet this section reads like a bunch of random speculation that an alien could come up with out of pure common sense in trying to explain things. Wikipedia can do better.
-
- No, YOU can do better. Be bold, and do the research, fix the article, and cite your sources. This article IS in need of help, YOURS! Murderbike 04:24, 19 July 2007 (UTC)