User talk:Ranierotazzi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A tag has been placed on Manhattan Piano Trio, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Boricuaeddie^{Talk • Contribs • Spread the love!} 00:15, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Contents 1 Suggestion 2 Warning 3 Reply 4 Reply 5 Isabelle van Keulen 6 Copyright problems 7 License tagging for Image:Andras Schiff in 2002.jpg

[edit] Suggestion

Please remember to always sign your comments on talk pages. Thank you. Yours truly, Boricuaeddie^{Talk • Contribs • Spread the love!} 00:19, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Warning

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Boricuaeddie^{Talk • Contribs • Spread the love!} 00:20, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reply

Hello. This is a reply to your comment on my talk page. I noticed from the deletion log that you have created this article 2 times. I think you must accept the fact that the Piano trio is just not notable enough for this encyclopedia. I suggest you forget about this article and continue contributing in other areas. I also suggest you stop re-creating the article, or you will be reported to the admins and maybe even blocked from editing. Finally, I suggest you remember to always sing your comments on talk pages with ~~~~ and always start new topics with ==TOPIC== at the bottom of talk pages, as these actions are considered good Wikiquette. Thank you. Yours truly, Boricuaeddie^{Talk • Contribs • Spread the love!} 22:33, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reply

Hi Eddy. First of all I wish to apologise about not using the correct signature to my replies. I am just learning how to use Wikipedia, and thank you for helping and explaining about this. About the deletion of my page, I feel this like a sort of abuse and as a little injustice. As I believe very much in this fantastic service which is Wikipedia, of course I will not insist in uploading the page about a Piano Trio that I do not even know the players personally, but I simply find them as very interesting musicians, high level musicianship and with an active professional and international career. Please, let me draw your attention to the fact that you have your own page (probably you are famous enough) and you describe yourself as a musician. Are you enough good musician to describe yourself to the world as a musician? Is it of any interest to anybody in the world that you are a musician? If yes, and I have no reason to doubt, I really would like to listen some of your recordings and see the schedule of your concerts. Given the fact that I am the manager of several wordwide famous classical musicians, I might be very interested in your musical activity. Going back to the Manhattan Piano Trio dispute, it is interesting to see that they have an average of about 10-15 professional recitals per month (by professional recital I mean that they are getting a regular fee, performing in established Performing Art Series, and are not performing for parents, relatives, friends, uncles, aunts, cousins, classmates and even pets). I would be very interested to see your concert schedule, that should be obviously better than theirs, considering that you feel necessary and have the right to inform the world about the fact that you are a musician. Thank you, all the best. Ranierotazzi 23:56, 11 May 2007 (UTC)Ranierotazzi P.S. If you wish to visit the Vatican City, do not hesitate to contact me. I am practically there and is really a great place to visit.

Hello. This is a reply to your comments on my talk page. I am now convinced you should re-create the article. Please be sure to include your explanation above on the article's talk page to avoid deletion. I also want to apologize for my misleading userboxes. As you can see on my userpage, I am in the 7th grade and am not planning on becoming a professional pianist. It is true I am a talented pianist, or so I've been told, as I have played in many areas of my country and the United States and have plans to play in Germany in upcoming years, but the piano still remains a hobby. Thank you anyway for supporting my talents. Yours truly, Boricuaeddie^{Talk • Contribs • Spread the love!} 02:26, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Isabelle van Keulen

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Isabelle van Keulen, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.kdschmid.de/englisch/02kuenst/1kuenstler.php3?k_id=178. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 00:06, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Isabelle van Keulen, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.kdschmid.de/englisch/02kuenst/1kuenstler.php3?k_id=178. As a copyright violation, Isabelle van Keulen appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Isabelle van Keulen has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Isabelle van Keulen and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Isabelle van Keulen with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Isabelle van Keulen.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 00:32, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Andras Schiff in 2002.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Andras Schiff in 2002.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:05, 29 January 2008 (UTC)