User talk:Randomator

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Hello Randomator! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking Image:Wikisigbutton.png or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Natl1 19:41, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

[edit] ‎An article that contains nothing but a full stop

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to ‎An article that contains nothing but a full stop. Readers looking for serious articles will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write (almost) whatever you want. Thank you. Pan Dan 11:08, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] An article that contains nothing but a full stop

I see from your contribution history you've made some good edits. Keep making those kinds of edits. Please stop making joke edits or you'll be blocked. Thanks. Pan Dan 11:47, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] regarding shock sites

there is reason why the current version of the page has less links, (ie wikipedia is not a definitive list).--KerotanTalk Have a nice day :) 11:04, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Right, we don't link to a historical version of a page in an article... there is a reason those were removed from the article in the first place; they failed WP:V and/or WP:N. BJAODN isn't the article space so a link there is fine.--Isotope23 talk 13:29, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "JJWJLW". The reason given for JJWJLW's block is: "Vandalism-only account".


  • Decline reason:

Can you explain why JJWJLW is editing the same sort of articles as you and using the same IP address as you? — Yamla 17:17, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Indeed I can:

  1. My ISP is Virgin Media, which means I have a shared I.P address (I've had this problem before)
  2. To be honest, I see very few similarities between my own edits and the edits of the blocked vandal. And either way my own edits are very different to those of JJWJLW.

With this explained, I am now asking for my unblock request to be reviewed Randomator 17:24, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Y

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock of 82.5.76.215 lifted or expired. I have released the autoblock but I suggest you manually force an ip change before you attempt to edit again. (i think you can do this by doing a hard reboot of your cable box

Request handled by: Spartaz Humbug! 17:32, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Galápagos Islands‎

I'm not sure if this was a joke or just vandalism, but please don't screw around with the articles. It just means someone has to come by and clean them up afterwards. In fact, I see you've previously reverted vandalism from a few articles yourself, so you should know this. I'll assume this was a one-off, and that the "escalating series of vandal notices" we use for newbies isn't necessary. Thanks. --barneca (talk) 15:10, 11 December 2007 (UTC)