User talk:Random Pipings

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. --ArmadilloFromHell 16:43, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Cirrhosis

I noted your addition to cirrhosis. Unfortunately the scientists mentioned in the Guardian article have not yet published their results. The only reference on their work so far that I could find was PMID 18159255. This is interesting, but it is research in mice with experimental fibrosis only. I think we should await further studies in humans (phase III at least) before this has any direct relevance for a general encyclopedia article. JFW | T@lk 17:21, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Notability of Martin Jean

A tag has been placed on Martin Jean requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Kannie | talk 17:37, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Redirects to non-existent pages

I'm very sorry about that. My computer looks for and deletes broken redirects every half-hour or so in a manner that requires very little human intervention. I see that all of those redirects exist now, so hopefully nothing important was lost. east.718 at 22:57, December 28, 2007

[edit] you might be interested in

Template:GroveOnline —Sesquialtera II (talk) 21:57, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Heya

Heya. Joining the project is nice and easy. Firstly go to WP:TROP and have a little browse on the page. This alot of useful information. On it you see a userbox template, now add the template to your user page, then add your name to the list of WPTC participants. Next, the WPTC has its own IRC channel, in which a lot of the WPTC members meet to talk about storms and other topics. If you have Chatzilla, you can use that, but the easiest way is to use this IRC page - put your name as your name, irc.freenode.net as the server, and #wiki-hurricanes as the server. They'll be able to give you help right away. Alright, the thing about articles is that the first one might be a bit difficult, but once you start the rest get easier. Adding to existing articles is one way to make things easier, as is an article on something you're interested in. For example, do you prefer older articles? Newer? Typhoons? Cyclones in the Indian Ocean? Pacific storms?

If there's any more questions, feel free 2 ask. See you around! Seddon69 (talk) 03:31, 12 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Stefan Engels.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Stefan Engels.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:28, 24 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Thomas Murray organist.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Thomas Murray organist.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:30, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Registration (organ)

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Registration (organ), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 18:00, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Re. your message on my talk page... you're very welcome, though most of the content is pulled directly from Organ stop. Had to do something, though, or they were going to delete it! —Cor anglais 16 04:45, 25 February 2008 (UTC)