Talk:Rant

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on 30 April 2008. The result of the discussion was merge and redirect.

This is a terrible article -- I daresay it could use a top-to-bottom re-write. Vranak 02:48, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

I agree, this article sucks. SpectrumDT 19:40, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
I love how you both agree it is awful, but neither of you bothered to change it. 138.130.81.212 05:43, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
It got better. Vranak
  • "The lower classes"? "Street definition"? Who wrote this? An aristocrat? This article itself is ironically worthy of a rant. I've re-written the introduction (still not good, though). A problem like this needs a complete transformation by many people, little by little. Uagehry456 22:49, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Well, I've rewritten the first section, and I think it is better. It could still use polishing, and the first sentence needs a major revision. Player 03 (talk) 21:29, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

I have removed the Characteristics section, which was the most preposterous section due to it mentioning the differences between the "incoherent" rants of upper-class citizens and the "white-person's rap" of the lower-class citizens. Blarvink 23:36, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Thank you!- Uagehry456 19:43, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

P.S.: When I said "This page is worthy of a rant", I didn't mean here, just figuratively. Dang, this page does not need an example. -Uagehry456|Talk 21:17, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Apparently, the source given for the "ranting is the how the poor express their ideas" definition which has since been removed was Urban Dictionary; not exactly a legitimate source of information.74.67.115.198 01:36, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards.

I suggest that no matter how good this article gets, we never remove this tag :)

"This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards!"

being a ranter, having been able to rant here, I no longer even feel I have to read the article! The tag rocks!

Mathiastck (talk) 18:20, 7 January 2008 (UTC)