User talk:Rambo4u
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I don't know what you mean about being hell bent of insulting the article. You say here in wikipedia we mention what scholars have mentioned in their books with references.. what do you think i did. All these statements were in the very articles you cited, you just left out all the bad stuff, so how can you say you are giving a neutral unbiased account of the available information? Your friend even request everyone to not put anything that may make the community sound anything less than the greatest most powerful community in the land. I simple have been trying to add a bit of rationality. You and Panel1 need to grow up, no one is perfect, there should be no shame in mentioning all aspects of a community. You don't need to make it sound insulting just pertinent and i have written nothing offensive, you may find it that way but a neutral person would not. I left out aravidu because it is a known fact the modern day descendants claim to be rajus so it is inaccurate to say they are balija's. If you read the mackenzie manuscripts which you so vehemently use to justify your statements, you will find that he clearly wrote that Krishna deva raya was of a kshatriya caste. His primariy queen gave birth to a son. Krishna deva raya was the son from another woman of Balija caste. Weather she was an official second queen or a mistress he is unsure, either way when his father died, his brother was regarded as the rightful heir but some minister felt he would make a better king and there was some civil unrest untill he proved his worthiness. Because his mother was a balija he made statements that he was a balija putra {Born of a balija). His son in laws who founded the aravidu dynasty were relations of the Saluva family, who were not balija but kshatriyas, one of the wifes of these son in laws was married to a balija princes who was related to the nayaks of tanjore etc.. The actual aravidu family are of the raju caste, their descendants in hampi and anegundi marry Rajus only, they state they are rajus, so this is why i deleted them from the list, not to vandalis but to be histroically acurrate. You could include them with this caveat but not as an absolute, which is required of any encylopedic article not just a research article. some people say is not a legitimate argument, in order to get legitimacy you need to write who says it and referrence the article with page numbers. I feel bad that you think i have some sort of malicious intent, i do not, the simple fact is we indians live on fantasys without looking at the fine details, and i think this is what cause many of the communal feelings. If we could take a factual unbiased view of the data i think we could mature to accepting that our forefathers were not as caste minded as we have become and maybe we would be shamed into doing the same.--Kapunadu (talk) 18:47, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Hello
Hello Rambo i appreciate your concerns but i clearly and iam happy to see you making some positive contributions towards the Article.. And it will be also good if you can monitor the page from mischief makers... Also wen you add new points try to showcase it as being a positive attribute for the community or mistakes done by the community not points which higlight or project the weaknesss of the community... If you rephraseiam leaving it the political section it would be good iam leaving it as is now... also i would like to communicate with you by email can you send me ur email... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Panel1 (talk • contribs) 12:03, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] October 2007
Sorry... didn't realize you were moving it. Use edit summaries, so we know what you're doing. Thanks! Gscshoyru 16:56, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AN/I
| Hello Rambo4u. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue that you may be involved with. The discussion can be found under the topic Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#IP editor and caste articles. You are free to comment at the discussion, but please remember to keep your comments within the bounds of the civility and "no personal attack" policies. Thank you. |
(We moved your thread there from WP:AN.) --Dynaflow babble 02:06, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Ponnala Laxmiah
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ponnala Laxmiah, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Ponnala Laxmiah. Basketballoneten 23:32, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] References
Do you think you could add references/expand your new articles please? RT | Talk 23:34, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- Could you also sign your comments with four tildes ~~~~ It automatically inserts your name and the date. You name automatically links to your user page. You can change the apperence of your signature in Special:Preferences RT | Talk 23:38, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Ponnala Laxmiah
A tag has been placed on Ponnala Laxmiah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cenarium (talk) 23:36, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Polisetty
A tag has been placed on Polisetty, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how Polisetty is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Polisetty saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 04:22, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Srihari
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Srihari, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0820240. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:59, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Mendu Rammohan Rao
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mendu Rammohan Rao, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.iirmworld.org.in/corporateinfo_mendurammohan.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:15, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Naidu
It does not matter if you disagree. The fact is that 'naidu' is not a caste. It is only a title. Marriages among Kamma, Balija, Gavara, Velama and Kannada Naickers in TN is an altogether different issue. These groups enumerate themselves as individual castes for all official, practical and census purposes. That makes your argument untenable in TN too. Be logical. I noticed that many of your inputs are being questioned by Wiki administrators. I advise you to study Wiki guidelines carefully. You have not yet probably noticed how to sign your username with tildes.Kumarrao (talk) 06:47, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Advice
I also noticed that you are deleting inputs from your talk page which is against Wiki policy. If you continue doing so, it will be reported to the administrators. Talk pages are valuable record of discussions. Follow Wiki gidelines.Kumarrao (talk) 06:53, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Contd
That is fine. We all learn step by step. When you write your comments and put a full stop, go down to the page where you notice "Sign your username" followed by four tildes. Simply click the tildes and save. It automatically signs your name.Kumarrao (talk) 07:20, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Kapu Surnames
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Kapu Surnames, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Kapu Surnames. barneca (talk) 17:05, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
