User talk:Ram2006

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Ram2006, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 


Multiculturalism is a disaster and genocide. --Ram2006 14:32, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Oral Sex

Please stop making disruptive edits to Oral Sex. Reviewing WP:NOT you will see that WP is neither censored, nor a soapbox where any one editor's views or sensitivies supercede others. David Spalding (☎ ✉ ✍) 02:43, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:RM2006_010.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:RM2006_010.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:21, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom murder

Please use the talk page to discuss changes to the article, rather than just inserting material without consensus. It's disruptive, and makes it difficult to work on a good article. --Haemo 03:51, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

I did not start any reverting war. I made a valid change, you reverted it.--Ram2006 03:53, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
I did not revert a "valid change" -- this has been discussed on the talk page; you've decided not to honor that consensus. --Haemo 03:55, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sourcing

Could you please support all your strong statements by sources, especially with regard to statistical data, such as 15 millions of illegal immigrants in Russsia, etc? It is very important to follow WP:SOURCE policy. Thanks. Biophys 20:40, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Furthermore, it is totally inappropriate to delete sources that satisfy WP:SOURCE, like you just did [1]. This may be considered vandalism. Please respect work of other people.Biophys 20:46, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism and spamming warning

In this edit [2] you deleted reliable sources and inserted youtube propaganda spam. Please do not do this again. Such incidents has to be reported to WP administrators.00:00, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

First, sign you messages. Second, I removed rusophobic propaganda links to fringe racist site. The videos are authentic. --Ram2006 14:39, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Please read WP:SOURCE and other WP policies. Any spam is "authentic". You have been warned.Biophys 15:39, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning. Do not do this:[3]Biophys 21:09, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Hi, I have noticed that you left a message accusing other editors in vandalism. In fact removing unsourced biased statements and original research does not constitute vandalism. On the other hand false accusation of others in vandalism constitutes personal attack and may make you blocked (as correctly mentioned by User:Biophys). It makes sense to familiarize yourself with the basic policies of Wikipedia:

It is not that I try to impress you with my knowledge of this alphabet soup, these are basic policies you have violated recently. It is worth to familiarize yourself with them so not to violate them the next time.

If you want to critisize SOVA Center remember that our own personal opinions worth nothing in Wikipedia (they belongs to personal blogs). Thus, find notable sources (large newspapers, academic publications, etc.) and put (Some notable guy) stated that SC is russophobic organization only pretending to be NGO <ref>reference according to [[WP:RS]]</ref>. If some info is an unchallenged fact (e.g. Ganushkina was accused by a court with such and such sentence). You can put the info in the article as a fact, but not forget the sources. As a rule let facts talk by themselves rather putting strong words and various spins. Allow all the notable opinions to be shown in the article.

Happy editing and please follow the best examples Alex Bakharev 01:10, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Thus, find notable sources (large newspapers, academic publications, etc.) and put (Some notable guy) stated that SC is russophobic organization only pretending to be NGO - who appointed a guy to be notable? Who decided which source is notable? Let me see: if in a town A run by mafia, where all TV, press, courts, government officials and businesses are controlled by that mafia, how can anybody who contradicts the mafia's point of view be even given a voice in public podium. And because one cannot express his opinion in notable sources, so one cannot be referenced in any article, one cannot be deemed a notable expert, and therefore one's truthful opinion may not be accepted as valid, because it is not notable, in the town A run by the mafia. You know where this is going? This is going towards a massive revolt by people, because those who voice their opinion are not notable, because they are opposed to the mafia that runs the town. --Ram2006 02:32, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Ta-gg-baldwinpark1.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Ta-gg-baldwinpark1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih 02:49, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Ta-gg-bp-f-thealamo.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Ta-gg-bp-f-thealamo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih 02:49, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Ta-gg-bp-terrorost2.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Ta-gg-bp-terrorost2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih 02:49, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Request for comment

Dear Ram2006: A request for comment regarding your edits at Internal Revenue Code has been initiated at Talk:Tax protester statutory arguments. You are welcome to participate in that discussion. Yours, Famspear (talk) 02:05, 25 February 2008 (UTC)