Talk:Ramjet

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

AVIATION This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
This article may be too technical for a general audience.
Please help improve this article by providing more context and better explanations of technical details to make it more accessible, without removing technical details.

[edit] Great new graphic, but

The new graphic is great but it couldnt be hello good samaratin in two ways. 1) it lacks a flameholder, usually just drawn as a zigzag line. 2) Most importantly, the design shown is supersonic, therefore it needs a converging-diverging exhaust nozzle to induce supersonic exhaust.

Finally, a subsonic rendition would be nice, with simple diverging intake diffuser and converging exhaust

Comment 2) is not strictly true! Even a convergent nozzle can generate a supersonic exhaust plume. The gross thrust is calculated at the throat as follows:
Fg = w.Vj/g +Aj(pj-pamb)
The first term is the momentum thrust, which generates the bulk of the thrust, whereas the second term is the residual pressure thrust. Ideally, a convergent-divergent nozzle will expand the flow so that there is zero pressure thrust (i.e pj=pamb) and all of the thrust is from the momentum term. Depending on nozzle pressure ratio, a con-di nozzle produces more thrust than the corresponding convergent unit. On a rocket motor the advantage is very large, because of the high nozzle pressure ratio. The advantage on a turbojet/turbofan is usually marginal, because nozzle pressure ratios are quite low. Ramjets are somewhere in between. :) Burbank 17.09 January 9 2006 (UTC)

The picture of the "low speed Ramjet" is worthless. That is NOT a ramjet. It's more of a space heater than anything else. A ramjet produces thrust, while theirs does not. It does not operate like a ramjet in any sense of the word. I removed the picture of it since it is misleading and doesn't contribute anything to an article about ramjets. Maybe it will be useful in an article about space heaters.

[edit] Youtube

Put this link to the article? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=duHJjcMAoWM&feature=related 84.56.62.55 (talk) 10:46, 22 February 2008 (UTC)