Talk:Ramírez Codex

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Mesoamerica, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to pre-Columbian Mesoamerica, its civilizations, history, accomplishments and other topics. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.
NB: Assessment ratings and other indicators given below are used by the Project in prioritising and managing its workload.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the Project's importance scale.
This article is also supported by the WikiProject Aztec sub-project.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate, you can edit the article. You can discuss the Project at its talk page.
Start
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

[edit] Change of linked text

I've replaced the previous link given here to the "Olmos" version translation (at the "Mexico Uprising" site), with a link to the original edited version by Christensen at the FAMSI site. It seems that the Mexico Uprising site has simply copied the entire reproduction provided by the FAMSI site, complete with Christensen's annotations and comments. While the actual text of the eng. translation itself is Public Domain (pub. 1883), Christensen's annotations are not, and it seems dubious of the M.U. site to have lifted it in entirety. Also, the hyperlinked notes to the text don't work at the M.U. site.--cjllw | TALK 05:11, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Good catch. Thank you, CJLL. 14:18, 31 July 2006 (UTC)