Talk:Ralph Heikkinen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Ralph Heikkinen has been listed as one of the Everyday life good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
	An entry from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on January 17, 2008.
February 24, 2008 Good article nominee Listed

	College football Portal Ralph Heikkinen is part of WikiProject College football, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
Assessment Comments This article has been rated for quality but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

	Ralph Heikkinen is part of WikiProject Michigan, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Michigan.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.

[edit] Auto Peer Review

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Consider adding more links to the article; per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) and Wikipedia:Build the web, create links to relevant articles.^[?]
• This article has no or few images. Please see if there are any free use images that fall under the Wikipedia:Image use policy and fit under one of the Wikipedia:Image copyright tags that can be uploaded. To upload images on Wikipedia, go to Special:Upload; to upload non-fair use images on the Wikimedia Commons, go to commons:special:upload.^[?]
• Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 183 pounds, use 183 pounds, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 183 pounds.^[?]
• Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, if January 15, 2006 appeared in the article, link it as January 15, 2006.^[?]
• Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally do not start with articles ('the', 'a(n)'). For example, if there was a section called ==The Biography==, it should be changed to ==Biography==.^[?]
• Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at Wikipedia:Guide to layout.^[?]
• As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space in between. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]^[?]
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.^[?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 00:07, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Good Article Review

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

Well done on this article. There's a few things I've noted that could use some improvement, but for the most part, you've got a very Good Article.

Record of edits:

• Fixed reference #2 - citation template was missing explicitly named title= parameter, which is required for correct usage
• Removed redlink to spring practice using popups
• Corrected grammatical error in "Freshman and sophomore years" - "some form employment" -> "some form of employment"

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   Proper citation templates are needed for references #81 and #92, "Ralph Heikkinen" and "University of Michigan Hall of Honor."

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Citations are needed in the lead section, even if the same information is cited further down the article.

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

   To avoid making the season sections too long, I'd recommend trying to pull all awards out into a separate section. Right now they're scattered in amongst everything else and it's hard to pick out all of the honors he did earn.

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   A few more images couldn't hurt. Even if you can't get one of him, try finding a stadium picture that goes along with the article well. Having a large uninterrupted block of text makes for a boring read.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   This easily passes; well done. I'd recommend taking this up to peer review after attempting to address the suggestions above to see what you need to do to get this up to FA status. This is a Good Article. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 22:20, 24 February 2008 (UTC)