Talk:Ralink
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Ralink is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a project to improve all Taiwan-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Taiwan-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale. | |
 |
This article is within the scope of the Business and Economics WikiProject. | |
| Stub | rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale. | |
I read that the 2400 chipset (11 Mbps) indeed had problems but no such thing for the 2500 chipset (54 Mbps) that followed a few months later.
- I would also like a citation on that. --ReCover 20:01, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
I _have_ an rt2400 and it works perfectly. Edit: Dang it I take that back :(.
[edit] Astroturfing
I got rid of some of the marketing speak and redundant information inserted by User:Mo808. Some of it was slightly useful but it was definitly written as an advertisement and Wikipedia is not a place to advertise your product
if someone can find a 3rd party report that says they actually have 12% they can get rid of the 'claims' bit —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Towel401 (talk • contribs) 21:57, August 22, 2007 (UTC).
Towel401 21:48, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] 802.11n
I added back in the 802.11n paragraph without the marketing names.
Ralink has 802.11n chipsets and are in the core testbed of the Wi-Fi Alliance. It can be verified here: http://www.wi-fi.org/newsrelease-051607-80211n-logo-testsuite
I'm open to other ways this can be written.
I think this is useful information to the public. Mo808 00:19, 25 August 2007 (UTC)Mo808
